Other Translations: Deutsch , Italiano , ру́сский язы́к

From: , ,

PreviousNext

Majjhima Nikāya 144 Middle Discourses 144

Channovādasutta Advice to Channa Advice to ChannaSource: https://www.digitalpalireader.online/_external/translations/bt-bdhrs/mn/mn_e_144.htm

Evaṁ me sutaṁ—So I have heard. This discourse recurs at SN 35.87. In the Saṁyutta Nikāya, as here in the Majjhima, it is immediately followed by the Puṇṇovādasutta (MN 145, SN 35.88).Thus have I heard.

ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā rājagahe viharati veḷuvane kalandakanivāpe. At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Rājagaha in the Bamboo Grove, the Squirrels’ Sanctuary.

Tena kho pana samayena āyasmā ca sāriputto āyasmā ca mahācundo āyasmā ca channo gijjhakūṭe pabbate viharanti. Now at that time the venerables Sāriputta, Mahācunda, and Channa were staying on the Vulture’s Peak Mountain. For Mahācunda, see note on MN 8:2.1. | This Channa only appears only in this discourse. He is evidently not the same person as the Buddha’s former charioteer who was famously admonished on the Buddha’s deathbed (DN 16:6.4.1).Now on that occasion the venerable Sāriputta, the venerable Mahā Cunda, and the venerable Channa were living on the mountain Vulture Peak.

Tena kho pana samayena āyasmā channo ābādhiko hoti dukkhito bāḷhagilāno. Now at that time Venerable Channa was sick, suffering, gravely ill. On that occasion the venerable Channa was afflicted, suffering, and gravely ill.

Atha kho āyasmā sāriputto sāyanhasamayaṁ paṭisallānā vuṭṭhito yenāyasmā mahācundo tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā āyasmantaṁ mahācundaṁ etadavoca: Then in the late afternoon, Venerable Sāriputta came out of retreat, went to Venerable Mahācunda and said to him, Then, when it was evening, the venerable Sāriputta rose from meditation, went to the venerable Mahā Cunda, and said to him:

“āyāmāvuso cunda, yenāyasmā channo tenupasaṅkamissāma gilānapucchakā”ti. “Come, Reverend Cunda, let’s go to see Venerable Channa and ask about his illness.” “Friend Cunda, let us go to the venerable Channa and ask about his illness.”

“Evamāvuso”ti kho āyasmā mahācundo āyasmato sāriputtassa paccassosi. “Yes, reverend,” replied Mahācunda. “Yes, friend,” the venerable Mahā Cunda replied.

Atha kho āyasmā ca sāriputto āyasmā ca mahācundo yenāyasmā channo tenupasaṅkamiṁsu; upasaṅkamitvā āyasmatā channena saddhiṁ sammodiṁsu. And then Sāriputta and Mahācunda went to see Channa and exchanged greetings with him. Then the venerable Sāriputta and the venerable Mahā Cunda went to the venerable Channa and exchanged greetings with him.

Sammodanīyaṁ kathaṁ sāraṇīyaṁ vītisāretvā ekamantaṁ nisīdiṁsu. Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho āyasmā sāriputto āyasmantaṁ channaṁ etadavoca: When the greetings and polite conversation were over, they sat down to one side. Then Sāriputta said to Channa, When this courteous and amiable talk was finished, they sat down at one side and the venerable Sāriputta said to the venerable Channa:

“kacci te, āvuso channa, khamanīyaṁ, kacci yāpanīyaṁ? Kacci te dukkhā vedanā paṭikkamanti, no abhikkamanti; paṭikkamosānaṁ paññāyati, no abhikkamo”ti? “I hope you’re keeping well, Reverend Channa, I hope you’re all right. I hope your pain is fading, not growing; that its fading is evident, not its growing.” “I hope you are getting well, friend Channa, I hope you are comfortable. I hope your painful feelings are subsiding and not increasing, and that their subsiding, not their increase, is apparent.”

“Na me, āvuso sāriputta, khamanīyaṁ na yāpanīyaṁ. Bāḷhā me dukkhā vedanā abhikkamanti, no paṭikkamanti; abhikkamosānaṁ paññāyati, no paṭikkamo. “Reverend Sāriputta, I’m not keeping well, I’m not getting by. My pain is terrible and growing, not fading; its growing is evident, not its fading. “Friend Sāriputta, I am not getting well, I am not comfortable. My painful feelings are increasing, not subsiding; their increase and not their subsiding is apparent.

Seyyathāpi, āvuso sāriputta, balavā puriso tiṇhena sikharena muddhani abhimattheyya; evameva kho me, āvuso sāriputta, adhimattā vātā muddhani ūhananti. The winds piercing my head are so severe, it feels like a strong man drilling into my head with a sharp point. Just as if a strong man were splitting my head open with a sharp sword, so too, violent winds cut through my head.

Na me, āvuso sāriputta, khamanīyaṁ na yāpanīyaṁ. Bāḷhā me dukkhā vedanā abhikkamanti, no paṭikkamanti; abhikkamosānaṁ paññāyati no paṭikkamo. I am not getting well, I am not comfortable. My painful feelings are increasing, not subsiding; their increase and not their subsiding is apparent.

Seyyathāpi, āvuso sāriputta, balavā puriso daḷhena varattakkhaṇḍena sīse sīsaveṭhaṁ dadeyya; evameva kho me, āvuso sāriputta, adhimattā sīse sīsavedanā. The pain in my head is so severe, it feels like a strong man tightening a strong leather strap around my head. Just as if a strong man were tightening a tough leather strap around my head as a headband, so too, there are violent pains in my head.

Na me, āvuso sāriputta, khamanīyaṁ na yāpanīyaṁ. Bāḷhā me dukkhā vedanā abhikkamanti, no paṭikkamanti; abhikkamosānaṁ paññāyati, no paṭikkamo. I am not getting well, I am not comfortable. My painful feelings are increasing, not subsiding; their increase and not their subsiding is apparent.

Seyyathāpi, āvuso sāriputta, dakkho goghātako vā goghātakantevāsī vā tiṇhena govikantanena kucchiṁ parikanteyya; evameva kho me, āvuso sāriputta, adhimattā vātā kucchiṁ parikantanti. The winds slicing my belly are so severe, like a deft butcher or their apprentice were slicing open a cow’s belly with a sharp meat cleaver. Just as if a skilled butcher or his apprentice were to carve up an ox’s belly with a sharp butcher’s knife, so too, violent winds are carving up my belly.

Na me, āvuso sāriputta, khamanīyaṁ na yāpanīyaṁ. Bāḷhā me dukkhā vedanā abhikkamanti, no paṭikkamanti; abhikkamosānaṁ paññāyati, no paṭikkamo. I am not getting well, I am not comfortable. My painful feelings are increasing, not subsiding; their increase and not their subsiding is apparent.

Seyyathāpi, āvuso sāriputta, dve balavanto purisā dubbalataraṁ purisaṁ nānābāhāsu gahetvā aṅgārakāsuyā santāpeyyuṁ samparitāpeyyuṁ; evameva kho me, āvuso sāriputta, adhimatto kāyasmiṁ ḍāho. The burning in my body is so severe, it feels like two strong men grabbing a weaker man by the arms to burn and scorch him on a pit of glowing coals. Just as if two strong men were to seize a weaker man by both arms and roast him over a pit of hot coals, so too, there is a violent burning in my body.

Na me, āvuso sāriputta, khamanīyaṁ na yāpanīyaṁ. Bāḷhā me dukkhā vedanā abhikkamanti, no paṭikkamanti; abhikkamosānaṁ paññāyati, no paṭikkamo. I’m not keeping well, I’m not getting by. My pain is terrible and growing, not fading; its growing is evident, not its fading. I am not getting well, I am not comfortable. My painful feelings are increasing, not subsiding; their increase and not their subsiding is apparent.

Satthaṁ, āvuso sāriputta, āharissāmi, nāvakaṅkhāmi jīvitan”ti. Reverend Sāriputta, I shall commit suicide. I don’t wish to live.” See note on MN 145:5.32.I shall use the knife, friend Sāriputta; I have no desire to live.”This is an elliptical expression for committing suicide.

“Māyasmā channo satthaṁ āharesi. “Please don’t commit suicide! “Let the venerable Channa not use the knife.

Yāpetāyasmā channo. Yāpentaṁ mayaṁ āyasmantaṁ channaṁ icchāma. Venerable Channa, keep going! We want you to keep going. Let the venerable Channa live. We want the venerable Channa to live.

Sace āyasmato channassa natthi sappāyāni bhojanāni, ahaṁ āyasmato channassa sappāyāni bhojanāni pariyesissāmi. If you don’t have any suitable food, we’ll find it for you. If he lacks suitable food, I will go in search of suitable food for him.

Sace āyasmato channassa natthi sappāyāni bhesajjāni, ahaṁ āyasmato channassa sappāyāni bhesajjāni pariyesissāmi. If you don’t have suitable medicine, we’ll find it for you. If he lacks suitable medicine, I will go in search of suitable medicine for him.

Sace āyasmato channassa natthi patirūpā upaṭṭhākā, ahaṁ āyasmantaṁ channaṁ upaṭṭhahissāmi. If you don’t have a capable carer, we’ll find one for you. If he lacks a proper attendant, I will attend on him.

Māyasmā channo satthaṁ āharesi. Please don’t commit suicide! Let the venerable Channa not use the knife.

Yāpetāyasmā channo. Yāpentaṁ mayaṁ āyasmantaṁ channaṁ icchāmā”ti. Venerable Channa, keep going! We want you to keep going.” Let the venerable Channa live. We want the venerable Channa to live.”

“Napi me, āvuso sāriputta, natthi sappāyāni bhojanāni; “Reverend Sāriputta, it’s not that I don’t have suitable food, “Friend Sāriputta, it is not that I have no suitable food;

napi me natthi sappāyāni bhesajjāni; or suitable medicine, it is not that I have no suitable medicine;

napi me natthi patirūpā upaṭṭhākā; or a capable carer. it is not that I have no proper attendant.

api cāvuso sāriputta, pariciṇṇo me satthā dīgharattaṁ manāpeneva no amanāpena. Moreover, for a long time now I have served the Teacher with love, not without love. But rather, friend Sāriputta, the Teacher has long been worshipped by me with love, not without love;

Etañhi, āvuso sāriputta, sāvakassa patirūpaṁ yaṁ satthāraṁ paricareyya manāpeneva no amanāpena. For it is proper for a disciple to serve the Teacher with love, not without love. for it is proper for the disciple to worship the Teacher with love, not without love.

‘Anupavajjaṁ channo bhikkhu satthaṁ āharissatī’ti evametaṁ, āvuso sāriputta, dhārehī”ti. You should remember this: ‘The mendicant Channa will commit suicide blamelessly.’” Friend Sāriputta, remember this: ‘the bhikkhu Channa will use the knife blamelessly.’”By making this statement he is implicitly claiming arahantship, as will be made clear at §13. Whether his claim at this point was valid or not is uncertain, the commentary regarding it as a case of self-overestimation.

“Puccheyyāma mayaṁ āyasmantaṁ channaṁ kañcideva desaṁ, sace āyasmā channo okāsaṁ karoti pañhassa veyyākaraṇāyā”ti. “I’d like to ask Venerable Channa about a certain point, if you’d take the time to answer.” “We would ask the venerable Channa certain questions, if the venerable Channa finds it opportune to reply.”

“Pucchāvuso sāriputta, sutvā vedissāmī”ti. “Ask, Reverend Sāriputta. When I’ve heard it I’ll know.” “Ask, friend Sāriputta. When I have heard, I shall know.”

“Cakkhuṁ, āvuso channa, cakkhuviññāṇaṁ cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassasi? “Reverend Channa, do you regard the eye, eye consciousness, and things knowable by eye consciousness in this way: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’? “Friend Channa, do you regard the eye, eye-consciousness, and things cognizable [by the mind] through eye-consciousness thus: ‘This is mine, this I am, this is my self’?

Sotaṁ, āvuso channa, sotaviññāṇaṁ …pe… Do you regard the ear … Do you regard the ear, ear-consciousness…

ghānaṁ, āvuso channa, ghānaviññāṇaṁ … nose … the nose, nose-consciousness…

jivhaṁ, āvuso channa, jivhāviññāṇaṁ … tongue … the tongue, tongue-consciousness…

kāyaṁ, āvuso channa, kāyaviññāṇaṁ … body … the body, body-consciousness…

manaṁ, āvuso channa, manoviññāṇaṁ manoviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘etaṁ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā’ti samanupassasī”ti? mind, mind consciousness, and things knowable by mind consciousness in this way: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” the mind, mind-consciousness, and things cognizable [by the mind] through mind-consciousness thus: ‘This is mine, this I am, this is my self’?”

“Cakkhuṁ, āvuso sāriputta, cakkhuviññāṇaṁ cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassāmi. “Reverend Sāriputta, I regard the eye, eye consciousness, and things knowable by eye consciousness in this way: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ “Friend Sāriputta, I regard the eye, eye-consciousness, and things cognizable [by the mind] through eye-consciousness thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’.

Sotaṁ, āvuso sāriputta …pe… I regard the ear … I regard the ear, ear-consciousness…

ghānaṁ, āvuso sāriputta … nose … the nose, nose-consciousness…

jivhaṁ, āvuso sāriputta … tongue … the tongue, tongue-consciousness…

kāyaṁ, āvuso sāriputta … body … the body, body-consciousness…

manaṁ, āvuso sāriputta, manoviññāṇaṁ manoviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassāmī”ti. mind, mind consciousness, and things knowable by mind consciousness in this way: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self’.” the mind, mind-consciousness, and things cognizable [by the mind] through mind-consciousness thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’.”

“Cakkhusmiṁ, āvuso channa, cakkhuviññāṇe cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbesu dhammesu kiṁ disvā kiṁ abhiññāya cakkhuṁ cakkhuviññāṇaṁ cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassasi? “Reverend Channa, what have you seen, what have you directly known in these things that you regard them in this way: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self’?” “Friend Channa, what have you seen and directly known in the eye, in eye-consciousness, and in things cognizable [by the mind] through eye-consciousness, that you regard them thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’?

Sotasmiṁ, āvuso channa, sotaviññāṇe … What have you seen and directly known in the ear, in ear-consciousness…

ghānasmiṁ, āvuso channa, ghānaviññāṇe … in the nose, in nose-consciousness…

jivhāya, āvuso channa, jivhāviññāṇe … in the tongue, in tongue-consciousness…

kāyasmiṁ, āvuso channa, kāyaviññāṇe … in the body, in body-consciousness…

manasmiṁ, āvuso channa, manoviññāṇe manoviññāṇaviññātabbesu dhammesu kiṁ disvā kiṁ abhiññāya manaṁ manoviññāṇaṁ manoviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassasī”ti? in the mind, in mind-consciousness, and in things cognizable [by the mind] through mind-consciousness, that you regard them thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’?”

“Cakkhusmiṁ, āvuso sāriputta, cakkhuviññāṇe cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbesu dhammesu nirodhaṁ disvā nirodhaṁ abhiññāya cakkhuṁ cakkhuviññāṇaṁ cakkhuviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassāmi. “Reverend Sāriputta, after seeing cessation, after directly knowing cessation in these things I regard them in this way: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self’.” “Friend Sāriputta, it is through seeing and directly knowing cessation in the eye, in eye-consciousness, and in things cognizable [by the mind] through eye-consciousness, that I regard them thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’.

Sotasmiṁ, āvuso sāriputta, sotaviññāṇe … It is through seeing and directly knowing cessation in the ear, in ear-consciousness…

ghānasmiṁ, āvuso sāriputta, ghānaviññāṇe … in the nose, in nose-consciousness…

jivhāya, āvuso sāriputta, jivhāviññāṇe … in the tongue, in tongue-consciousness…

kāyasmiṁ, āvuso sāriputta, kāyaviññāṇe … in the body, in body-consciousness…

manasmiṁ, āvuso sāriputta, manoviññāṇe manoviññāṇaviññātabbesu dhammesu nirodhaṁ disvā nirodhaṁ abhiññāya manaṁ manoviññāṇaṁ manoviññāṇaviññātabbe dhamme ‘netaṁ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā’ti samanupassāmī”ti. in the mind, in mind-consciousness, and in things cognizable [by the mind] through mind-consciousness, that I regard them thus: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self’.”

Evaṁ vutte, āyasmā mahācundo āyasmantaṁ channaṁ etadavoca: When he said this, Venerable Mahācunda said to Venerable Channa: When this was said, the venerable Mahā Cunda said to the venerable Channa:MA says that Ven. Mahā Cunda gave him this instruction thinking that he must still be an ordinary person, since he could not endure the deadly pains and wanted to commit suicide.

“tasmātiha, āvuso channa, idampi tassa bhagavato sāsanaṁ, niccakappaṁ manasi kātabbaṁ: “So, Reverend Channa, you should regularly apply your mind to this instruction of the Buddha: Mahācunda is about to quote a phrase that appears at Ud 8.4.“Therefore, friend Channa, this instruction of the Blessed One’s is to be constantly given attention:

‘nissitassa calitaṁ, anissitassa calitaṁ natthi. ‘For the dependent there is quivering. For the independent there’s no quivering. The “dependent” is the world of conditions. The “independent” is Nibbāna. | “Quivering” is calita.‘There is wavering in one who is dependent, there is no wavering in one who is independent;

Calite asati passaddhi, When there’s no quivering, there is tranquility. when there is no wavering, there is tranquillity;

passaddhiyā sati nati na hoti. When there is tranquility, there’s no inclination. “Inclination” is nati, from a root meaning “to bend”. Sometimes used in the sense of a “inclination of mind” (MN 19:6.1), here, as the following lines make clear, it refers to the mind inclining to rebirth; explained by the commentary as “craving”. Compare the English idiom, “one is bent on destruction”.when there is tranquillity, there is no bias;

Natiyā asati āgatigati na hoti. When there’s no inclination, there’s no coming and going. when there is no bias, there is no coming and going;

Āgatigatiyā asati cutūpapāto na hoti. When there’s no coming and going, there’s no passing away and reappearing. when there is no coming and going, there is no passing away and reappearing;

Cutūpapāte asati nevidha na huraṁ na ubhayamantarena. When there’s no passing away and reappearing, there’s no this life or the next or between the two. Vedic cosmology speaks of a tripartite world: the earth, the heavens, and the “midspace” (antarikṣa), namely the atmosphere. The gods journey through the midspace to earth for the sacrifice, bringing bounty for mortals (eg. Rig Veda 7.45). Later, the process of rebirth was conceived of as a path of cosmological ascent returning to the world of the gods or the fathers (eg. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 5.10.1). For the suttas, rebirth is likewise seen as a process of moving between states, like a person leaving a house, walking down the street, and entering another house (DN 2:96.1).when there is no passing away and reappearing, there is no here nor beyond nor in between.

Esevanto dukkhassā’”ti. Just this is the end of suffering.’” This is the end of suffering.’”The sense of this instruction might be explained with the help of MA thus: One is dependent because of craving and views and becomes independent by abandoning them with the attainment of arahantship. Bias (nati, lit. bending) comes about through craving, and its absence means there is no inclination or desire for existence. There is no coming and going by the ending of rebirth and death, no here nor beyond nor in between by the transcendence of this world, the world beyond, and the passage between one and the other. This is the end of the suffering of defilements and the suffering of the round.

Atha kho āyasmā ca sāriputto āyasmā ca mahācundo āyasmantaṁ channaṁ iminā ovādena ovaditvā uṭṭhāyāsanā pakkamiṁsu. And when the venerables Sāriputta and Mahācunda had given Venerable Channa this advice they rose from their seats and left. Then when the venerable Sāriputta and the venerable Mahā Cunda had advised the venerable Channa thus, they rose from their seats and went away.

Atha kho āyasmā channo acirapakkante āyasmante ca sāriputte āyasmante ca mahācunde satthaṁ āharesi. Not long after those venerables had left, Venerable Channa committed suicide. Then, soon after the venerable Sāriputta and the venerable Mahā Cunda had gone, the venerable Channa used the knife.MA: He cut his throat, and just at that moment the fear of death descended on him and the sign of future rebirth appeared. Recognising that he was still an ordinary person, he was aroused and developed insight. Comprehending the formations, he attained arahantship just before he expired.

Atha kho āyasmā sāriputto yena bhagavā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ nisīdi. Ekamantaṁ nisinno kho āyasmā sāriputto bhagavantaṁ etadavoca: Then Sāriputta went up to the Buddha, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to him, Then the venerable Sāriputta went to the Blessed One, and after paying homage to him, he sat down at one side and said to the Blessed One:

“āyasmatā, bhante, channena satthaṁ āharitaṁ. “Sir, Venerable Channa has committed suicide. “Venerable sir, the venerable Channa has used the knife.

Tassa kā gati, ko abhisamparāyo”ti? Where has he been reborn in his next life?” What is his destination, what is his future course?”

“Nanu te, sāriputta, channena bhikkhunā sammukhāyeva anupavajjatā byākatā”ti? “Sāriputta, didn’t the mendicant Channa declare his blamelessness to you personally?” “Sāriputta, didn’t the bhikkhu Channa declare to you his blamelessness?”MA: Although this declaration (of blamelessness) was made while Channa was still a worldling, as his attainment of final Nibbāna followed immediately, the Buddha answered by referring to that very declaration. It should be noted that this commentarial interpretation is imposed on the text from the outside, as it were. If one sticks to the actual wording of the text it seems that Channa was already an arahant when he made his declaration, the dramatic punch being delivered by the failure of his two brother-monks to recognise this. The implication, of course, is that excruciating pain might motivate even an arahant to take his own life—not from aversion but simply from a wish to be free from unbearable pain.

“Atthi, bhante, pubbajiraṁ nāma vajjigāmo. “Sir, there is a Vajjian village named Pubbajira. There are several variant spellings of this name, which does not seem to appear elsewhere.“Venerable sir, there is a Vajjian village called Pubbajira.

Tatthāyasmato channassa mittakulāni suhajjakulāni upavajjakulānī”ti. There Channa had families who were friendly, intimate, and hospitable.” The text plays with homonyms of upavajja as “blameworthy” (Sanskrit upavadya) and as “hospitable” (commentary: upasaṅkamitabba, Sanskrit upavrajya).There the venerable Channa had friendly families, intimate families, approachable families [as his supporters].”The terms used to describe the lay families which supported the Venerable Channa—mittakulāni suhajjakulāni upavajjakulāni—are obviously synonymous. The third term gives the opportunity for a word play. MA glosses it upasaṅkamitabbakulāni, “families to be approached” (that is, for his requisites). According to CPD, upavajja here represents Skt upavrajya; the word in this sense is not in PED, though this may be the only instance where it bears such a meaning. The word is homonymous with another word meaning “blameworthy,” representing Skt upavadya, thus linking up with Channa’s earlier avowal that he would kill himself blamelessly (anupavajja). See the following note.

“Honti hete, sāriputta, channassa bhikkhuno mittakulāni suhajjakulāni upavajjakulāni. “The mendicant Channa did indeed have such families. “Indeed, Sāriputta, the bhikkhu Channa had friendly families, intimate families, approachable families [as his supporters];

Nāhaṁ, sāriputta, ettāvatā ‘saupavajjo’ti vadāmi. But, Sāriputta, this is not enough for me to call someone ‘blameworthy’. but I do not say that to this extent he was blameworthy.

Yo kho, sāriputta, imañca kāyaṁ nikkhipati aññañca kāyaṁ upādiyati tamahaṁ ‘saupavajjo’ti vadāmi. When someone lays down this body and takes up another body, I call them ‘blameworthy’. Sāriputta, when one lays down this body and takes up a new body, then I say one is blameworthy.

Taṁ channassa bhikkhuno natthi. But the mendicant Channa did no such thing. The Buddha confirms that Channa was an arahant.This did not happen in the case of the bhikkhu Channa;

‘Anupavajjo channo bhikkhu satthaṁ āharesī’ti evametaṁ, sāriputta, dhārehī”ti. You should remember this: ‘The mendicant Channa committed suicide blamelessly.’” Suicide generally is condemned in Buddhism as the taking of a human life. But from this and similar incidents (SN 4.23, SN 22.87) it is widely accepted that suicide in the final throes of a terminal illness is allowable for arahants, as they are incapable of committing a blameworthy act. The suttas, however, can also be read to support the reverse reading: the reason it is allowable for arahants is because it is not blameworthy. The underlying logic would be that ending life is normally bad because life is valuable, but at such a point life no longer has any value. Obviously this is a complex issue that cannot be resolved by a few short scriptural passages, but a Buddhist would be motivated by compassion and understanding for those going through such terrible suffering.remember this, Sāriputta: ‘the bhikkhu Channa used the knife blamelessly.’”This statement seems to imply that Channa was an arahant at the time he committed suicide, though the commentary explains otherwise. When the Buddha speaks about the conditions under which one is blameworthy (sa-upavajja), upavajja represents upavadya. Though earlier MA explained the correct sense of upavajjakulāni, here the commentator seems oblivious to the pun and comments as if Channa had actually been at fault for associating too closely with lay people: “The Elder Sāriputta, showing the fault of intimacy with families (kulasaṁsaggadosa) in the preliminary stage of practice, asks: ‘When that bhikkhu had such supporters, could he have attained final Nibbāna?’ The Blessed One answers showing that he was not intimate with families.”

Idamavoca bhagavā. That is what the Buddha said. That is what the Blessed One said.

Attamano āyasmā sāriputto bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandīti. Satisfied, Venerable Sāriputta approved what the Buddha said. The venerable Sāriputta was satisfied and delighted in the Blessed One’s words.

Channovādasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ dutiyaṁ.
PreviousNext