Other Translations: Deutsch , Srpski
From: ,
Dīgha Nikāya 21 Long Discourses 21
Sakkapañhasutta Sakka’s Questions
Evaṁ me sutaṁ—So I have heard. This late sutta exhibits considerable literary sophistication. The A-plot concerns Sakka’s rejection of his violent past and embrace of the Dhamma, while the B-plot concerns Pañcasikkha’s more modest growth from a libertine to a married man. This draws on such precedents as Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 3.2.4.4, where the centaur is urged to win his woman by seduction rather than force. | This discourse is quoted by name and a passage discussed at SN 22.4. In addition, the dialogue at MN 37 picks up directly where this leaves off and may be considered a sequel. A Sanskrit parallel published by Ernst Waldschmidt in 1979 is available on SuttaCentral as SF 241. A different discourse of the same name is found at SN 35.118.
ekaṁ samayaṁ bhagavā magadhesu viharati, pācīnato rājagahassa ambasaṇḍā nāma brāhmaṇagāmo, tassuttarato vediyake pabbate indasālaguhāyaṁ. At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Magadhans, where east of Rājagaha there is a brahmin village named Ambasaṇḍā, north of which, on Mount Vediyaka, is Indra’s hill cave. Rhys Davids follows the commentary in translating this “the cave of Indra’s Sāl Tree”. However the Sanskrit yāvacchailaguhāyām supports “hill cave”.
Tena kho pana samayena sakkassa devānamindassa ussukkaṁ udapādi bhagavantaṁ dassanāya. Now at that time Sakka, the lord of gods, grew eager to see the Buddha.
Atha kho sakkassa devānamindassa etadahosi: He thought,
“kahaṁ nu kho bhagavā etarahi viharati arahaṁ sammāsambuddho”ti? “Where is the Blessed One at present, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha?”
Addasā kho sakko devānamindo bhagavantaṁ magadhesu viharantaṁ pācīnato rājagahassa ambasaṇḍā nāma brāhmaṇagāmo, tassuttarato vediyake pabbate indasālaguhāyaṁ. Seeing that the Buddha was at Indra’s hill cave,
Disvāna deve tāvatiṁse āmantesi: he addressed the gods of the thirty-three,
“ayaṁ, mārisā, bhagavā magadhesu viharati, pācīnato rājagahassa ambasaṇḍā nāma brāhmaṇagāmo, tassuttarato vediyake pabbate indasālaguhāyaṁ. “Good fellows, the Buddha is staying in the land of the Magadhans at Indra’s hill cave.
Yadi pana, mārisā, mayaṁ taṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkameyyāma arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhan”ti? What if we were to go and see that Blessed One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha?”
“Evaṁ, bhaddantavā”ti kho devā tāvatiṁsā sakkassa devānamindassa paccassosuṁ. “Yes, lord,” replied the gods.
Atha kho sakko devānamindo pañcasikhaṁ gandhabbadevaputtaṁ āmantesi: Then Sakka addressed the centaur Pañcasikha, Introduced in a minor role in DN 18, DN 19, and DN 20, Pañcasikha gets his moment to shine in this sutta. Outside of the Dīghanikāya, he appears only in SN 35.119. His name means “Fivecrest”, evidently in reference to his impressive hairdo; a nymph or group of nymphs bore the synonymous name Pañcacūḍā, “Five Topknots”. The centaur (gandhabba) was a wild rogue of music, dancing, and sex. He must be tamed, and here this is achieved through the power of love and filial respect. A less diplomatic approach is taken in Atharvaveda 4.37.7, where the gandharva with his “egg-crest” (śikhaṇḍino) is threatened with castration.
“ayaṁ, tāta pañcasikha, bhagavā magadhesu viharati pācīnato rājagahassa ambasaṇḍā nāma brāhmaṇagāmo, tassuttarato vediyake pabbate indasālaguhāyaṁ. “Dear Pañcasikha, the Buddha is staying in the land of the Magadhans at Indra’s hill cave.
Yadi pana, tāta pañcasikha, mayaṁ taṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkameyyāma arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhan”ti? What if we were to go and see that Blessed One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha?”
“Evaṁ, bhaddantavā”ti kho pañcasikho gandhabbadevaputto sakkassa devānamindassa paṭissutvā beluvapaṇḍuvīṇaṁ ādāya sakkassa devānamindassa anucariyaṁ upāgami. “Yes, lord,” replied the centaur Pañcasikha. Taking his arched harp made from the pale timber of wood-apple, he went as Sakka’s attendant. The “arched harp” (vīṇa) was a stringed instrument held in the lap, whose form is clear from representations in ancient Indian sculptures in Bharhut, Amarāvatī, and Pawāyā, as well as the coins of Samudragupta. The strings, typically seven in number, were attached to the base of the soundbox and passed through holes in the parchment resonator to be tied with cords to the curved neck (these parts are listed at SN 35.246:4.17). It accompanied song or dance, and was played equally by men and women. It is not the modern Indian instrument called veena, which is a lute or stick zither, but rather is similar to the Burmese saung. | Gandhabbas are closely associated with music (Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 3.2.4). Māra’s harp is described in the same way (SN 4.23:10.7), and tradition says they were in fact the same instrument.
Atha kho sakko devānamindo devehi tāvatiṁsehi parivuto pañcasikhena gandhabbadevaputtena purakkhato—Then Sakka went at the head of a retinue consisting of the gods of the thirty-three and the godling centaur Pañcasikha. In the Buddhist hierarchy of divinity, gandhabbas occupy a more humble place than the gods of the thirty-three, yet here Pañcasikha appears with them in a position of honor. In DN 19:28.3 we saw that the even more exalted Brahmā takes the form of Pañcasikha. This fluidity is characteristic of old Vedic cosmology, where there is no clear hierarchy of divinity. The formalized hierarchies in Buddhism and Hinduism are a later conception.
seyyathāpi nāma balavā puriso samiñjitaṁ vā bāhaṁ pasāreyya pasāritaṁ vā bāhaṁ samiñjeyya; evameva—devesu tāvatiṁsesu antarahito magadhesu pācīnato rājagahassa ambasaṇḍā nāma brāhmaṇagāmo, tassuttarato vediyake pabbate paccuṭṭhāsi. As easily as a strong person would extend or contract their arm, he vanished from the heaven of the gods of the thirty-three and landed on Mount Vediyaka north of Ambasaṇḍā.
Tena kho pana samayena vediyako pabbato atiriva obhāsajāto hoti ambasaṇḍā ca brāhmaṇagāmo yathā taṁ devānaṁ devānubhāvena. Now at that time a dazzling light appeared over Mount Vediyaka and Ambasaṇḍā, as happens through the glory of the gods.
Apissudaṁ parito gāmesu manussā evamāhaṁsu: People in the villages round about, terrified, shocked, and awestruck, said,
“ādittassu nāmajja vediyako pabbato jhāyatisu nāmajja vediyako pabbato jalatisu. Nāmajja vediyako pabbato. “Mount Vediyaka must be on fire today, blazing and burning!
Kiṁsu nāmajja vediyako pabbato atiriva obhāsajāto ambasaṇḍā ca brāhmaṇagāmo”ti; Oh why has such a dazzling light appeared over Mount Vediyaka and Ambasaṇḍā?”
saṁviggā lomahaṭṭhajātā ahesuṁ.
Atha kho sakko devānamindo pañcasikhaṁ gandhabbadevaputtaṁ āmantesi: Then Sakka addressed the centaur Pañcasikha,
“durupasaṅkamā kho, tāta pañcasikha, tathāgatā mādisena, jhāyī jhānaratā, tadantaraṁ paṭisallīnā. “My dear Pañcasikha, it is hard for one like me to get near the Realized Ones while they are on retreat practicing absorption, enjoying absorption. We will learn later of how Sakka’s appearance could be too disturbing for the Buddha while on retreat (DN 21:1.10.13). Pañcasikha, on the other hand, would appear alone, without a retinue. Note, however, that on subsequent occasions Sakka showed no such reticence, either because he was already a stream-enterer or because the Buddha was not in solitary retreat.
Yadi pana tvaṁ, tāta pañcasikha, bhagavantaṁ paṭhamaṁ pasādeyyāsi, tayā, tāta, paṭhamaṁ pasāditaṁ pacchā mayaṁ taṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkameyyāma arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhan”ti. But if you were to charm the Buddha first, then I could go to see him.”
“Evaṁ, bhaddantavā”ti kho pañcasikho gandhabbadevaputto sakkassa devānamindassa paṭissutvā beluvapaṇḍuvīṇaṁ ādāya yena indasālaguhā tenupasaṅkami; upasaṅkamitvā: “Yes, lord,” replied the centaur Pañcasikha. Taking his arched harp made from the pale timber of wood-apple, he went to Indra’s hill cave. When he had drawn near, he stood to one side, thinking,
“ettāvatā me bhagavā neva atidūre bhavissati nāccāsanne, saddañca me sossatī”ti—“This is neither too far nor too near; and he’ll hear my voice.”
ekamantaṁ aṭṭhāsi.
1. Pañcasikhagītagāthā 1. Pañcasikha’s Song
Ekamantaṁ ṭhito kho pañcasikho gandhabbadevaputto beluvapaṇḍuvīṇaṁ assāvesi, imā ca gāthā abhāsi buddhūpasañhitā dhammūpasañhitā saṅghūpasañhitā arahantūpasañhitā kāmūpasañhitā: Standing to one side, Pañcasikha played his arched harp, and sang these verses on the Buddha, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the perfected ones, and sensual love. The idea that the Buddha would be wooed by a love song seems like an absurd conceit, until you take into account the centaurs’ dangerous reputation as inveterate lechers. Pañcasikha wants to show that he is maturing and finally seeking a commitment in a respectable marriage.
“Vande te pitaraṁ bhadde, “O Bhaddā Suriyavaccasā, my Darling Sunshine, Suriyavaccasā (“Sunshine”) accords with the Vedic conception of the wife as the Sun (Sūryā, Rig Veda 10.85) who takes as husband Soma, the moon. She appears in Atharvaveda 8.10.27, which invokes the gandharvas with their female counterpart the “nymphs” (Pali accharā, Sanskrit apsaras).
timbaruṁ sūriyavacchase; I pay homage to your father Timbaru, In Sanskrit literature, Timbaru (Sanskrit tumburu, “coriander”) was an elder gandharva musician in the courts of Indra and Kuvera. According to Rāmāyaṇa 3.4, he was cursed with a monstrous form by Kuvera due to an inappropriate lust for the nymph Rambhā. Upon his defeat at the hands of Rāma he was restored to his former status. Pañcasikha would have wanted to avoid a similar fate. Rather than Suriyavaccasā, the Sanskrit literature mentions his daughters Manuvantī and Sukeśī; the latter name (“fair-hair”) evokes the streaming rays of the sun (Vāyupurāṇa 69.49 = Brahmāṇḍapurāṇa 2.7.13).
Yena jātāsi kalyāṇī, through whom was born a lady so fine,
ānandajananī mama. to fill me with a joy I never knew.
Vātova sedataṁ kanto, As sweet as a breeze to one who’s sweating,
pānīyaṁva pipāsato; or when thirsty, a sweet and cooling drink,
Aṅgīrasi piyāmesi, so dear are you, Aṅgīrasi, to me—Aṅgīrasi means “shining one” and is etymologically linked with agni (“fire”). Suriyavaccasā earned the name due to both her radiant nature and her family connections: her father Timbaru was a son of Kaśyapa, who was (according to certain lineages) brother of Aṅgīras, from whom the Aṅgīrasas were descended. In the Arthavaveda—the only early non-Buddhist source for a nymph named Suriyavaccasā—aṅgīrasi is associated with witchcraft (Atharvaveda 12.5.52). Aṅgīrasa is also a patronymic of the Buddha (DN 32:3.14).
dhammo arahatāmiva. just like the teaching is to all the saints! “Saints” is arahantā, which I normally translate as “perfected ones”.
Āturasseva bhesajjaṁ, Like a cure when you’re struck by fever dire,
bhojanaṁva jighacchato; or food to ease the hunger pain,
Parinibbāpaya maṁ bhadde, come on, Bhaddā, please put out my fire, Parinibbāpaya, “please quench me”. Pañcasikha subverts imagery employed by the Buddha—quenching thirst, cooling breezes, extinguished flames—to erotic effect.
jalantamiva vārinā. quench me like water on a flame.
Sītodakaṁ pokkharaṇiṁ, As elephants burning in the heat of summer,
yuttaṁ kiñjakkhareṇunā; sink down in a lotus pond to rest,
Nāgo ghammābhitattova, so cool, full of petals and of pollen—
ogāhe te thanūdaraṁ. that’s how I would plunge into your breast.
Accaṅkusova nāgova, Like elephants bursting bonds in rutting season, Pañcasikha is showing off his literary skill. The same image, the elephant, illustrates opposing qualities, peaceful and violent. In these two sides of sensual desire, he reveals, unconsciously perhaps, the rapacious side of his own nature. For Pañcasikha, the elephant bursting its bonds illustrates his crazed devotion, whereas later it illustrates breaking free of desire (DN 21:1.12.45).
jitaṁ me tuttatomaraṁ; beating off the pricks of lance and pikes—
Kāraṇaṁ nappajānāmi, I just don’t understand what is the reason
sammatto lakkhaṇūruyā. I’m so crazy for your shapely thighs!
Tayi gedhitacittosmi, For you, my heart is full of passion,
cittaṁ vipariṇāmitaṁ; I’m in a besotted state of mind.
Paṭigantuṁ na sakkomi, There is no going back, I’m just not able,
vaṅkaghastova ambujo. I’m like a fish that’s hooked up on the line.
Vāmūru saja maṁ bhadde, Come on, my Bhaddā, hold me, fair of thighs!
saja maṁ mandalocane; Embrace me, maid of captivating eyes!
Palissaja maṁ kalyāṇi, Take me in your arms, my lovely lady,
etaṁ me abhipatthitaṁ. that’s all I’d ever want or could desire.
Appako vata me santo, Ah, then my desire was such a small thing,
kāmo vellitakesiyā; my sweet, with your curling wavy hair;
Anekabhāvo samuppādi, now, like to arahants an offering,
arahanteva dakkhiṇā. it’s grown so very much from there.
Yaṁ me atthi kataṁ puññaṁ, Whatever the merit I have forged
arahantesu tādisu; by giving to such perfected beings—
Taṁ me sabbaṅgakalyāṇi, may that, my altogether gorgeous,
tayā saddhiṁ vipaccataṁ. ripen in togetherness with you. For how a married couple may stay together in this life and the next, see AN 4.55.
Yaṁ me atthi kataṁ puññaṁ, Whatever the merit I have forged
asmiṁ pathavimaṇḍale; in this vast territory,
Taṁ me sabbaṅgakalyāṇi, may that, my altogether gorgeous,
tayā saddhiṁ vipaccataṁ. ripen in togetherness with you.
Sakyaputtova jhānena, As the Sakyan, absorbed, did meditate
ekodi nipako sato; at one, alert, and mindful too, Nipaka (“alert”) is explained in the Pali tradition as “wise”. The root pāl, rather, suggests the sense “on guard, alert”, which is supported by such phrases as “mindfully alert and on guard” (ārakkhasatino nipakkasatino, AN 5.114:3.1), where nipaka parallels ārakkha (“guarding”). Likewise, the Vedic sense is “one who keeps watch, a protector” (Rig Veda 4.45.6, 10.44.4).
Amataṁ muni jigīsāno, the sage seeking the state free of death—Pañcasikha is using the present participle jigīsāno in the historical present.
tamahaṁ sūriyavacchase. so I, oh my Sunshine, seek for you!
Yathāpi muni nandeyya, And just like the sage would delight,
patvā sambodhimuttamaṁ; once he had awakened to the truth,
Evaṁ nandeyyaṁ kalyāṇi, so I would delight, my fine lady,
missībhāvaṁ gato tayā. were I to become one with you.
Sakko ce me varaṁ dajjā, If Sakka were to grant me one wish, A gandharva wedding is a pure love-match, without the blessing of parents or priests (Manu 3.32). Here, however, Pañcasikha wants to do the right thing and get the father’s blessing.
tāvatiṁsānamissaro; as Lord of the Thirty and Three,
Tāhaṁ bhadde vareyyāhe, my Bhaddā, you’re all I would wish for,
evaṁ kāmo daḷho mama. so strong is the love in me.
Sālaṁva na ciraṁ phullaṁ, Like a freshly blossoming sal tree
pitaraṁ te sumedhase; is your father, my lady so wise.
Vandamāno namassāmi, I pay homage to he, bowing humbly,
yassāsetādisī pajā”ti. whose daughter is of such a kind.”
Evaṁ vutte, bhagavā pañcasikhaṁ gandhabbadevaputtaṁ etadavoca: When Pañcasikha had spoken, the Buddha said to him,
“saṁsandati kho te, pañcasikha, tantissaro gītassarena, gītassaro ca tantissarena; “Pañcasikha, the sound of your strings blends well with the sound of your singing, If Pañcasikha was seeking the Buddha’s approval for his love-match, he was doomed to disappointment, as the Buddha and his mendicants do not involve themselves in arranging marriages. The Buddha sidesteps the issue by politely complementing Pañcasikha on his musicianship.
na ca pana te, pañcasikha, tantissaro gītassaraṁ ativattati, gītassaro ca tantissaraṁ. so that neither overpowers the other.
Kadā saṁyūḷhā pana te, pañcasikha, imā gāthā buddhūpasañhitā dhammūpasañhitā saṅghūpasañhitā arahantūpasañhitā kāmūpasañhitā”ti? But when did you compose these verses on the Buddha, the teaching, the Saṅgha, the perfected ones, and sensual love?” “When did you compose” is also at MN 56:30.1.
“Ekamidaṁ, bhante, samayaṁ bhagavā uruvelāyaṁ viharati najjā nerañjarāya tīre ajapālanigrodhe paṭhamābhisambuddho. “This one time, sir, when you were first awakened, you were staying in Uruvelā at the goatherd’s banyan tree on the bank of the Nerañjarā River.
Tena kho panāhaṁ, bhante, samayena bhaddā nāma sūriyavacchasā timbaruno gandhabbarañño dhītā, tamabhikaṅkhāmi. And at that time I was in love with Bhaddā Suriyavaccasā, who they call ‘Darling Sunshine’, the daughter of the centaur king Timbaru.
Sā kho pana, bhante, bhaginī parakāminī hoti; But the sister desired another. “Sister” (bhaginī) is a respectful term of address, but is normally used in a chaste sense. When Raṭṭhapāla calls his wives “sister”, they faint in shock (MN 82:23.4).
sikhaṇḍī nāma mātalissa saṅgāhakassa putto, tamabhikaṅkhati. It was the one named Sikhaṇḍī, the son of Mātali the chariot handler, who she loved. Sikhaṇḍī (“egg-crested”) is the term for the centaur as seductive threat to women in Atharvaveda 4.37.7. It is also a poetic term for a peacock.
Yato kho ahaṁ, bhante, taṁ bhaginiṁ nālatthaṁ kenaci pariyāyena. Since I couldn’t win that sister by any means,
Athāhaṁ beluvapaṇḍuvīṇaṁ ādāya yena timbaruno gandhabbarañño nivesanaṁ tenupasaṅkamiṁ; upasaṅkamitvā beluvapaṇḍuvīṇaṁ assāvesiṁ, imā ca gāthā abhāsiṁ buddhūpasañhitā dhammūpasañhitā saṅghūpasañhitā arahantūpasañhitā kāmūpasañhitā—I took my arched harp to Timbaru’s home, where I played those verses.
Vande te pitaraṁ bhadde,
timbaruṁ sūriyavacchase;
Yena jātāsi kalyāṇī,
ānandajananī mama.
…pe…
Sālaṁva na ciraṁ phullaṁ,
pitaraṁ te sumedhase;
Vandamāno namassāmi,
yassāsetādisī pajāti.
Evaṁ vutte, bhante, bhaddā sūriyavacchasā maṁ etadavoca: When I finished, Suriyavaccasā said to me,
‘na kho me, mārisa, so bhagavā sammukhā diṭṭho, api ca sutoyeva me so bhagavā devānaṁ tāvatiṁsānaṁ sudhammāyaṁ sabhāyaṁ upanaccantiyā. ‘Good fellow, I have not personally seen the Buddha. But I did hear about him when I went to dance for the gods of the thirty-three in the Hall of Clear Right.
Yato kho tvaṁ, mārisa, taṁ bhagavantaṁ kittesi, hotu no ajja samāgamo’ti. Since you extol the Buddha, let us meet up today.’
Soyeva no, bhante, tassā bhaginiyā saddhiṁ samāgamo ahosi. And that’s when I met up with that sister.
Na ca dāni tato pacchā”ti. But we have not met since.”
2. Sakkūpasaṅkama 2. The Approach of Sakka
Atha kho sakkassa devānamindassa etadahosi: Then Sakka, lord of gods, thought,
“paṭisammodati pañcasikho gandhabbadevaputto bhagavatā, bhagavā ca pañcasikhenā”ti. “Pañcasikha is exchanging pleasantries with the Buddha.”
Atha kho sakko devānamindo pañcasikhaṁ gandhabbadevaputtaṁ āmantesi: So he addressed Pañcasikha,
“abhivādehi me tvaṁ, tāta pañcasikha, bhagavantaṁ: “My dear Pañcasikha, please bow to the Buddha for me, saying:
‘sakko, bhante, devānamindo sāmacco saparijano bhagavato pāde sirasā vandatī’”ti. ‘Sir, Sakka, lord of gods, with his ministers and retinue, bows with his head at your feet.’”
“Evaṁ, bhaddantavā”ti kho pañcasikho gandhabbadevaputto sakkassa devānamindassa paṭissutvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādeti: “Yes, lord,” replied Pañcasikha. He bowed to the Buddha and said,
“sakko, bhante, devānamindo sāmacco saparijano bhagavato pāde sirasā vandatī”ti. “Sir, Sakka, lord of gods, with his ministers and retinue, bows with his head at your feet.”
“Evaṁ sukhī hotu, pañcasikha, sakko devānamindo sāmacco saparijano; “So may Sakka with his ministers and retinue be happy, Pañcasikha,” said the Buddha,
sukhakāmā hi devā manussā asurā nāgā gandhabbā ye caññe santi puthukāyā”ti. “for all want to be happy—whether gods, humans, titans, dragons, centaurs, or any of the other diverse creatures there may be.”
Evañca pana tathāgatā evarūpe mahesakkhe yakkhe abhivadanti. For that is how the Realized Ones salute such illustrious spirits.
Abhivadito sakko devānamindo bhagavato indasālaguhaṁ pavisitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ aṭṭhāsi. And being saluted by the Buddha, Sakka entered Indra’s hill cave, bowed to the Buddha, and stood to one side.
Devāpi tāvatiṁsā indasālaguhaṁ pavisitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ aṭṭhaṁsu. And the gods of the thirty-three did likewise,
Pañcasikhopi gandhabbadevaputto indasālaguhaṁ pavisitvā bhagavantaṁ abhivādetvā ekamantaṁ aṭṭhāsi. as did Pañcasikha.
Tena kho pana samayena indasālaguhā visamā santī samā samapādi, sambādhā santī urundā samapādi, andhakāro guhāyaṁ antaradhāyi, āloko udapādi yathā taṁ devānaṁ devānubhāvena. And at that time the uneven places were evened out, the cramped places were opened up, the darkness vanished in the cave and light appeared, as happens through the glory of the gods.
Atha kho bhagavā sakkaṁ devānamindaṁ etadavoca: Then the Buddha said to Sakka,
“acchariyamidaṁ āyasmato kosiyassa, abbhutamidaṁ āyasmato kosiyassa tāva bahukiccassa bahukaraṇīyassa yadidaṁ idhāgamanan”ti. “It’s incredible and amazing that you, the venerable Kosiya, who has so many duties and so much to do, should come here.” It is rare for the Buddha to address a deity as “venerable” (āyasmā), a term usually reserved for monks. Moggallāna addresses Sakka as “the venerable Kosiya” at MN 37:10.6; Mahākassapa calls him Kosiya without honorific at Ud 3.7:3.12. | The word kosiya is explained by the commentaries as “owl”, which, if correct, would have been the totem for a clan of that name. It is, however, a patronymic: Rig Veda 1.10.11 has indra kauśika which means “Indra, son of Kuśika (or Kuśa)”. Kuśa grass is critical to the performance of Vedic rites, and the label probably initially implied “Brahmanized”, i.e. a king whose reign was authorized according to Vedic ritual. Kosiya is said to be a low class family name (Bu Pc 2:2.1.18).
“Cirapaṭikāhaṁ, bhante, bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkamitukāmo; api ca devānaṁ tāvatiṁsānaṁ kehici kehici kiccakaraṇīyehi byāvaṭo; evāhaṁ nāsakkhiṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkamituṁ. “For a long time I’ve wanted to come and see the Buddha, but I wasn’t able, being prevented by my many duties and responsibilities for the gods of the thirty-three.
Ekamidaṁ, bhante, samayaṁ bhagavā sāvatthiyaṁ viharati salaḷāgārake. This one time, sir, the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in the salaḷa tree hut. For salaḷa see note on SN 52.8:1.1.
Atha khvāhaṁ, bhante, sāvatthiṁ agamāsiṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya. Then I went to Sāvatthī to see the Buddha.
Tena kho pana, bhante, samayena bhagavā aññatarena samādhinā nisinno hoti, bhūjati ca nāma vessavaṇassa mahārājassa paricārikā bhagavantaṁ paccupaṭṭhitā hoti, pañjalikā namassamānā tiṭṭhati. But at that time the Buddha was sitting immersed in some kind of meditation. And a divine maiden of Great King Vessavaṇa named Bhūjati was attending on the Buddha, standing there paying homage to him with cupped palms. A paricārikā is a maid attending on a nymph (MN 37:8.12). | Bhūjati (variant bhuñjatī) does not seem to appear elsewhere.
Atha khvāhaṁ, bhante, bhūjatiṁ etadavocaṁ: So I said to her,
‘abhivādehi me tvaṁ, bhagini, bhagavantaṁ: ‘Sister, please bow to the Buddha for me, saying:
“sakko, bhante, devānamindo sāmacco saparijano bhagavato pāde sirasā vandatī”’ti. “Sir, Sakka, lord of gods, with his ministers and retinue, bows with his head at your feet.”’
Evaṁ vutte, bhante, sā bhūjati maṁ etadavoca: When I said this, she said to me,
‘akālo kho, mārisa, bhagavantaṁ dassanāya; ‘It’s the wrong time to see the Buddha,
paṭisallīno bhagavā’ti. as he’s in retreat.’
‘Tena hi, bhagini, yadā bhagavā tamhā samādhimhā vuṭṭhito hoti, atha mama vacanena bhagavantaṁ abhivādehi: ‘Well then, sister, please convey my message when the Buddha emerges from that immersion.’
“sakko, bhante, devānamindo sāmacco saparijano bhagavato pāde sirasā vandatī”’ti.
Kacci me sā, bhante, bhaginī bhagavantaṁ abhivādesi? I hope that sister bowed to you?
Sarati bhagavā tassā bhaginiyā vacanan”ti? Do you remember what she said?”
“Abhivādesi maṁ sā, devānaminda, bhaginī, sarāmahaṁ tassā bhaginiyā vacanaṁ. “She did bow, lord of gods, and I remember what she said.
Api cāhaṁ āyasmato nemisaddena tamhā samādhimhā vuṭṭhito”ti. I also remember that it was the sound of your chariot wheels that pulled me out of that immersion.” Sakka pointedly ignores this, but perhaps his shame at disturbing the Buddha’s meditation explains his oblique method of gaining an audience.
“Ye te, bhante, devā amhehi paṭhamataraṁ tāvatiṁsakāyaṁ upapannā, tesaṁ me sammukhā sutaṁ sammukhā paṭiggahitaṁ: “Sir, I have heard and learned this in the presence of the gods who were reborn in the host of the thirty-three before me:
‘yadā tathāgatā loke uppajjanti arahanto sammāsambuddhā, dibbā kāyā paripūrenti, hāyanti asurakāyā’ti. ‘When a Realized One arises in the world, perfected and fully awakened, the heavenly hosts swell, while the titan hosts dwindle.’
Taṁ me idaṁ, bhante, sakkhidiṭṭhaṁ yato tathāgato loke uppanno arahaṁ sammāsambuddho, dibbā kāyā paripūrenti, hāyanti asurakāyāti. And I have seen this with my own eyes.
2.1. Gopakavatthu 2.1. The Story of Gopikā
Idheva, bhante, kapilavatthusmiṁ gopikā nāma sakyadhītā ahosi buddhe pasannā dhamme pasannā saṅghe pasannā sīlesu paripūrakārinī. Right here in Kapilavatthu there was a Sakyan lady named Gopikā who had confidence in the Buddha, the teaching, and the Saṅgha, and had fulfilled her ethics. This implies she was a stream-enterer.
Sā itthittaṁ virājetvā purisattaṁ bhāvetvā kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ upapannā. Losing her attachment to femininity, she developed masculinity. When her body broke up, after death, she was reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. In Buddhism, sex is mutable between lives and even within one life (Bu Pj 1:10.6.1). Later Buddhists sometimes held that the status of a male was preferable. Here this is not stated outright, but the narrative implies that she thought her station was improved when becoming a male. Notably, it is not the Buddha who says this, but Sakka, relaying the story of another deity. That the proponent was a woman, at least formerly, is a trope of Indian literature: a woman is the ideal misogynist (see eg. Ja 61 or Śivapurāna chapter 4). Here, though, the situation is nuanced, because despite her (presumed) inferior status, she has better rebirth than the monks she served.
Devānaṁ tāvatiṁsānaṁ sahabyataṁ amhākaṁ puttattaṁ ajjhupagatā. In the company of the gods of the thirty-three she became one of my sons.
Tatrapi naṁ evaṁ jānanti: There they knew him as
‘gopako devaputto, gopako devaputto’ti. the godling Gopaka.
Aññepi, bhante, tayo bhikkhū bhagavati brahmacariyaṁ caritvā hīnaṁ gandhabbakāyaṁ upapannā. Meanwhile three others, mendicants who had led the spiritual life under the Buddha, were reborn in the inferior centaur realm. The realm of centaurs is “inferior” because the centaurs are known for their ribald sexuality.
Te pañcahi kāmaguṇehi samappitā samaṅgībhūtā paricārayamānā amhākaṁ upaṭṭhānaṁ āgacchanti amhākaṁ pāricariyaṁ. There they amused themselves, supplied and provided with the five kinds of sensual stimulation, and became my servants and attendants.
Te amhākaṁ upaṭṭhānaṁ āgate amhākaṁ pāricariyaṁ gopako devaputto paṭicodesi: At that, Gopaka scolded them,
‘kutomukhā nāma tumhe, mārisā, tassa bhagavato dhammaṁ assuttha—‘Where on earth were you at, good fellows, when you heard the Buddha’s teaching! Kutomukhā, which occurs only in this sutta, contrasts with sammukhā (“in the presence of”, “from the mouth of”). The commentary explains it as a rhetorical question, “Were you distracted or falling asleep?” Alternatively, it might mean “From whom did you learn the Buddha’s teaching?” It recurs later in the verses. This is not the only such case: duddiṭṭharūpaṁ and kāyaṁ brahmapurohitaṁ are other examples of terms found nowhere else in the Pali canon, yet found here both in prose and in verse. Clearly one has been copied from the other; it seems to me that the rarity of these terms and the greater coherence of the verses suggests that the prose is a (somewhat altered) summary of the verses.
ahañhi nāma itthikā samānā buddhe pasannā dhamme pasannā saṅghe pasannā sīlesu paripūrakārinī itthittaṁ virājetvā purisattaṁ bhāvetvā kāyassa bhedā paraṁ maraṇā sugatiṁ saggaṁ lokaṁ upapannā, devānaṁ tāvatiṁsānaṁ sahabyataṁ sakkassa devānamindassa puttattaṁ ajjhupagatā. For while I was still a woman I had confidence in the Buddha, the teaching, and the Saṅgha, and had fulfilled my ethics. I lost my attachment to femininity and developed masculinity. When my body broke up, after death, I was reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm. In the company of the gods of the thirty-three I became one of Sakka’s sons.
Idhāpi maṁ evaṁ jānanti: Here they know me as
“gopako devaputto gopako devaputto”ti. the godling Gopaka.
Tumhe pana, mārisā, bhagavati brahmacariyaṁ caritvā hīnaṁ gandhabbakāyaṁ upapannā. But you, having led the spiritual life under the Buddha, were reborn in the inferior centaur realm.
Duddiṭṭharūpaṁ vata bho addasāma, ye mayaṁ addasāma sahadhammike hīnaṁ gandhabbakāyaṁ upapanne’ti. It is a sad sight indeed to see fellow practitioners reborn in the inferior centaur realm.’
Tesaṁ, bhante, gopakena devaputtena paṭicoditānaṁ dve devā diṭṭheva dhamme satiṁ paṭilabhiṁsu kāyaṁ brahmapurohitaṁ, eko pana devo kāme ajjhāvasi. When scolded by Gopaka, two of those gods regained their memory right away. They went to the host of the priests of Divinity, but one god remained attached to sensual pleasures. The commentary explains the verb “gained” (paṭilabhiṁsu) as serving dual roles here: “gaining” of “absorption mindfulness” (jhānasatiṁ), upon which they “gain” rebirth in the Brahmā realm. However, the verses below speak of “recollecting” (anussaraṁ) the Buddha’s teachings at this juncture. Compare Bu NP 23:1.1.20, where the king “remembered” his long-forgotten promise (vissaritvā cirena satiṁ paṭilabhitvā). AN 4.191:2.24 speaks of the “arising of memory” (satuppādo) in a deity when reminded of Dhamma passages they once recited as a monk. | The phrase kāyaṁ brahmapurohitaṁ is syntactically incongruous; I think it was clumsily copied from the verses below, where the required verb (ajjhagaṁsu) is present. The commentary explains it as “a Minister of Brahmā’s body” (brahmapurohitasarīraṁ), but in such contexts kāya usually means “host”.
‘Upāsikā cakkhumato ahosiṁ, ‘“I was a laywoman disciple of the Clear-eyed One,
Nāmampi mayhaṁ ahu “gopikā”ti; and my name was Gopikā.
Buddhe ca dhamme ca abhippasannā, I was devoted to the Buddha and the teaching,
Saṅghañcupaṭṭhāsiṁ pasannacittā. and I faithfully served the Saṅgha.
Tasseva buddhassa sudhammatāya, Because of the clear rightness of the Buddha’s teaching,
Sakkassa puttomhi mahānubhāvo; I’m now a mighty, dazzling son of Sakka,
Mahājutīko tidivūpapanno, reborn in the Third Heaven.
Jānanti maṁ idhāpi “gopako”ti. And here they know me as Gopaka.
Athaddasaṁ bhikkhavo diṭṭhapubbe, Then I saw some mendicants who I’d seen before,
Gandhabbakāyūpagate vasīne; dwelling in the host of centaurs.
Imehi te gotamasāvakāse, They were disciples of Gotama
Ye ca mayaṁ pubbe manussabhūtā. when I used to be a human.
Annena pānena upaṭṭhahimhā, I served them with food and drink,
Pādūpasaṅgayha sake nivesane; and clasped their feet in my own home. When bowing, it is a special sign of devotion to touch the feet of the one revered (eg. MN 89:9.1).
Kutomukhā nāma ime bhavanto, Where on earth were these good fellows at
Buddhassa dhammāni paṭiggahesuṁ. when they learned the Buddha’s teachings?
Paccattaṁ veditabbo hi dhammo, For each must know for themselves the teaching
Sudesito cakkhumatānubuddho; so well-taught, realized by the Clear-eyed One.
Ahañhi tumheva upāsamāno, I was one who followed you, Here Gopaka shifts from speaking about them in third person to speaking to them in second person.
Sutvāna ariyāna subhāsitāni. having heard the fine words of the noble ones.
Sakkassa puttomhi mahānubhāvo, I’m now a mighty, dazzling son of Sakka,
Mahājutīko tidivūpapanno; reborn in the Third Heaven.
Tumhe pana seṭṭhamupāsamānā, But you followed the best of men,
Anuttaraṁ brahmacariyaṁ caritvā. and led the supreme spiritual life,
Hīnaṁ kāyaṁ upapannā bhavanto, but still you’re born in this lesser realm,
Anānulomā bhavatūpapatti; a rebirth unbefitting.
Duddiṭṭharūpaṁ vata addasāma, It’s a sad sight I see, good fellows,
Sahadhammike hīnakāyūpapanne. fellow practitioners in a lesser realm.
Gandhabbakāyūpagatā bhavanto, Reborn in the host of centaurs,
Devānamāgacchatha pāricariyaṁ; only to wait upon the gods.
Agāre vasato mayhaṁ, Meanwhile, I dwelt in a house—I.e. she was a lay person.
Imaṁ passa visesataṁ. but see my distinction now!
Itthī hutvā svajja pumomhi devo, Having been a woman now I’m a male god,
Dibbehi kāmehi samaṅgibhūto’; blessed with heavenly sensual pleasures.”
Te coditā gotamasāvakena, Scolded by that disciple of Gotama, Up until now, the verses have been spoken by Gopaka, but here a narrator appears.
Saṁvegamāpādu samecca gopakaṁ. comprehending Gopaka, they were struck with urgency.
‘Handa viyāyāma byāyāma, “Let’s strive, let’s try hard—
Mā no mayaṁ parapessā ahumhā’; we won’t serve others any more!”
Tesaṁ duve vīriyamārabhiṁsu, Two of them roused up energy,
Anussaraṁ gotamasāsanāni. recalling the Buddha’s instructions.
Idheva cittāni virājayitvā, Right away they became dispassionate,
Kāmesu ādīnavamaddasaṁsu; seeing the drawbacks in sensual pleasures.
Te kāmasaṁyojanabandhanāni, The fetters and bonds of sensual pleasures—
Pāpimayogāni duraccayāni. the ties of the Wicked One so hard to break—
Nāgova sannāni guṇāni chetvā, they burst them like a bull elephant his ropes,
Deve tāvatiṁse atikkamiṁsu; and passed right over the thirty-three.
Saindā devā sapajāpatikā, The gods with Indra and the Progenitor
Sabbe sudhammāya sabhāyupaviṭṭhā. were all gathered in the Hall of Clear Right.
Tesaṁ nisinnānaṁ abhikkamiṁsu, As they sat there, they passed over them,
Vīrā virāgā virajaṁ karontā; the heroes desireless, practicing purity.
Te disvā saṁvegamakāsi vāsavo, Seeing them, Vāsava was struck with urgency; Normally rebirth is described as passing away in one realm then being reborn in another. Yet here the gods of the thirty-three—in their traditional abode on Mount Meru—were watching them literally fly from one realm to another.
Devābhibhū devagaṇassa majjhe. the master of gods in the midst of the group said,
‘Imehi te hīnakāyūpapannā, “These were born in the lesser centaur realm,
Deve tāvatiṁse abhikkamanti’; but now they pass us by!”
Saṁvegajātassa vaco nisamma, Heeding the speech of one so moved,
So gopako vāsavamajjhabhāsi. Gopaka addressed Vāsava,
‘Buddho janindatthi manussaloke, “There is a Buddha, a lord of men, in the world. The truncated janind’ is not vocative janinda for Sakka, but nominative janindo for the Buddha.
Kāmābhibhū sakyamunīti ñāyati; Known as the Sakyan Sage, he’s mastered the senses. “Sakyan Sage” (sakyamuni) became a favorite epithet of the Buddha, but in early texts it appears only here and the Ratanasutta (Snp 2.1:4.2).
Tasseva te puttā satiyā vihīnā, Those sons of his lost their memory; “Sons” in a spiritual sense.
Coditā mayā te satimajjhalatthuṁ’. but when scolded by me they gained it back.
Tiṇṇaṁ tesaṁ āvasinettha eko, Of the three, there is one who remains
Gandhabbakāyūpagato vasīno; dwelling in the host of centaurs.
Dve ca sambodhipathānusārino, But two, recollecting the path to awakening,
Devepi hīḷenti samāhitattā. serene, spurn even the gods.
Etādisī dhammappakāsanettha, Such is the explanation of the teaching here: The commentary says, “In this dispensation the explanation of the teaching is such that because of it, disciples become endowed with such qualities” (ettha sāsane evarūpā dhammappakāsanā, yāya sāvakā etehi guṇehi samannāgatā honti). This explains the feminine etādisī; pakasanā, which is normally neuter, is feminine here. This use is fairly common in later texts (it occurs at the conclusion of the Ṭīkā for this sutta).
Na tattha kiṅkaṅkhati koci sāvako; not a single disciple doubts that. Kiṅkaṅkhati is a unique term for “doubt”.
Nitiṇṇaoghaṁ vicikicchachinnaṁ, We venerate the Buddha, the victor, lord of men,
Buddhaṁ namassāma jinaṁ janindaṁ. who has crossed the flood and cut off doubt.
Yaṁ te dhammaṁ idhaññāya, They attained distinction to the extent
visesaṁ ajjhagaṁsu te; they understood the teaching here;
Kāyaṁ brahmapurohitaṁ, two of them distinguished
duve tesaṁ visesagū. in the host of the priests of Divinity.”’ The end point of Gopaka’s speech is hard to determine, as there is no -ti to mark it. Various editions and translations either ignore the issue or end it in different places. The next line marks the beginning of Sakka’s direct speech to the Buddha, and I think it makes the best sense to assume that up to here he has been relating the story he was told.
Tassa dhammassa pattiyā, We have come here, dear sir,
āgatamhāsi mārisa; to realize this same teaching.
Katāvakāsā bhagavatā, If the Buddha would give me a chance,
pañhaṁ pucchemu mārisā”ti. I would ask a question, dear sir.”
Atha kho bhagavato etadahosi: Then it occurred to the Buddha,
“dīgharattaṁ visuddho kho ayaṁ yakkho, yaṁ kiñci maṁ pañhaṁ pucchissati, sabbaṁ taṁ atthasañhitaṁyeva pucchissati, no anatthasañhitaṁ. “For a long time now this spirit has led a pure life. Any question he asks me will be beneficial, not unbeneficial.
Yañcassāhaṁ puṭṭho byākarissāmi, taṁ khippameva ājānissatī”ti. And he will quickly understand any answer I give to his question.”
Atha kho bhagavā sakkaṁ devānamindaṁ gāthāya ajjhabhāsi: So the Buddha addressed Sakka in verse:
“Puccha vāsava maṁ pañhaṁ, “Ask me your question, Vāsava,
yaṁ kiñci manasicchasi; whatever you want.
Tassa tasseva pañhassa, I’ll solve each and every
ahaṁ antaṁ karomi te”ti. question you have.”
Paṭhamabhāṇavāro niṭṭhito. The first recitation section is complete.
Katāvakāso sakko devānamindo bhagavatā imaṁ bhagavantaṁ paṭhamaṁ pañhaṁ apucchi: Having been granted an opportunity by the Buddha, Sakka asked the first question.
“Kiṁsaṁyojanā nu kho, mārisa, devā manussā asurā nāgā gandhabbā ye caññe santi puthukāyā, te: “Good fellow, what fetters bind the gods, humans, titans, dragons, centaurs—and any of the other diverse creatures—
‘averā adaṇḍā asapattā abyāpajjā viharemu averino’ti iti ca nesaṁ hoti, atha ca pana saverā sadaṇḍā sasapattā sabyāpajjā viharanti saverino”ti? so that, though they wish to be free of enmity, violence, hostility, and hate, they still have enmity, violence, hostility, and hate?” This question hints at Sakka’s own evolution from the battlegod of the Vedas to an acolyte of peace.
Itthaṁ sakko devānamindo bhagavantaṁ pañhaṁ apucchi. Such was Sakka’s question to the Buddha.
Tassa bhagavā pañhaṁ puṭṭho byākāsi: And the Buddha answered him:
“Issāmacchariyasaṁyojanā kho, devānaminda, devā manussā asurā nāgā gandhabbā ye caññe santi puthukāyā, te: “Lord of gods, the fetters of jealousy and stinginess bind the gods, humans, titans, dragons, centaurs—and any of the other diverse creatures—Jealousy is wanting what others have, while stinginess is not wanting to share what you have.
‘averā adaṇḍā asapattā abyāpajjā viharemu averino’ti iti ca nesaṁ hoti, atha ca pana saverā sadaṇḍā sasapattā sabyāpajjā viharanti saverino”ti. so that, though they wish to be free of enmity, violence, hostility, and hate, they still have enmity, violence, hostility, and hate.”
Itthaṁ bhagavā sakkassa devānamindassa pañhaṁ puṭṭho byākāsi. Such was the Buddha’s answer to Sakka.
Attamano sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandi anumodi: Delighted, Sakka approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, saying,
“evametaṁ, bhagavā, evametaṁ, sugata. “That’s so true, Blessed One! That’s so true, Holy One!
Tiṇṇā mettha kaṅkhā vigatā kathaṅkathā bhagavato pañhaveyyākaraṇaṁ sutvā”ti. Hearing the Buddha’s answer, I’ve gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision.”
Itiha sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinanditvā anumoditvā bhagavantaṁ uttari pañhaṁ apucchi: And then, having approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, Sakka asked another question:
“Issāmacchariyaṁ pana, mārisa, kiṁnidānaṁ kiṁsamudayaṁ kiṁjātikaṁ kiṁpabhavaṁ; “But good fellow, what is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of jealousy and stinginess? Compare with the side branch of dependent origination at DN 15:9.1, the origins of disputes at Snp 4.11, and the analysis of proliferation at MN 18. Note the constructive use of the “yes, and” method of questioning. Sakka finds wisdom due to his curiosity, neither being too-easily sated with a simple answer, nor quibbling that the answer is inadequate, but building on the foundations of understanding.
kismiṁ sati issāmacchariyaṁ hoti; When what exists is there jealousy and stinginess?
kismiṁ asati issāmacchariyaṁ na hotī”ti? When what doesn’t exist is there no jealousy and stinginess?”
“Issāmacchariyaṁ kho, devānaminda, piyāppiyanidānaṁ piyāppiyasamudayaṁ piyāppiyajātikaṁ piyāppiyapabhavaṁ; “The liked and the disliked, lord of gods, are the source of jealousy and stinginess.
piyāppiye sati issāmacchariyaṁ hoti, When the liked and the disliked exist there is jealousy and stinginess.
piyāppiye asati issāmacchariyaṁ na hotī”ti. When the liked and the disliked don’t exist there is no jealousy and stinginess.”
“Piyāppiyaṁ pana, mārisa, kiṁnidānaṁ kiṁsamudayaṁ kiṁjātikaṁ kiṁpabhavaṁ; “But good fellow, what is the source of what is liked and disliked?”
kismiṁ sati piyāppiyaṁ hoti;
kismiṁ asati piyāppiyaṁ na hotī”ti?
“Piyāppiyaṁ kho, devānaminda, chandanidānaṁ chandasamudayaṁ chandajātikaṁ chandapabhavaṁ; “Desire is the source of what is liked and disliked.” Compare Snp 4.11:4.1.
chande sati piyāppiyaṁ hoti;
chande asati piyāppiyaṁ na hotī”ti.
“Chando pana, mārisa, kiṁnidāno kiṁsamudayo kiṁjātiko kiṁpabhavo; “But what is the source of desire?”
kismiṁ sati chando hoti;
kismiṁ asati chando na hotī”ti?
“Chando kho, devānaminda, vitakkanidāno vitakkasamudayo vitakkajātiko vitakkapabhavo; “Thought is the source of desire.” Here we depart from the normal sequence, which is that feelings give rise to craving (taṇhā). In Snp 4.11:6.1 it is said that pleasure and pain give rise to desire, not thought.
vitakke sati chando hoti;
vitakke asati chando na hotī”ti.
“Vitakko pana, mārisa, kiṁnidāno kiṁsamudayo kiṁjātiko kiṁpabhavo; “But what is the source of thought?”
kismiṁ sati vitakko hoti;
kismiṁ asati vitakko na hotī”ti?
“Vitakko kho, devānaminda, papañcasaññāsaṅkhānidāno papañcasaññāsaṅkhāsamudayo papañcasaññāsaṅkhājātiko papañcasaññāsaṅkhāpabhavo; “Judgments driven by the proliferation of perceptions are the source of thoughts.” “Judgments that emerge from the proliferation of perceptions” renders papañcasaññāsaṅkhā. Again the sequence departs from MN 18:16.1, which says that thoughts—which are normal and morally neutral psychological processes—give rise to “proliferation” (papañca), which is when craving and delusion cause thought to spin out of control. “Proliferation” then solidifies into “judgments” that fuel an individual’s delusion of “self” persisting through time.
papañcasaññāsaṅkhāya sati vitakko hoti;
papañcasaññāsaṅkhāya asati vitakko na hotī”ti.
“Kathaṁ paṭipanno pana, mārisa, bhikkhu papañcasaññāsaṅkhānirodhasāruppagāminiṁ paṭipadaṁ paṭipanno hotī”ti? “But how does a mendicant fittingly practice for the cessation of judgments driven by the proliferation of perceptions?”
2.2. Vedanākammaṭṭhāna 2.2. Meditation on Feelings
“Somanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—“Lord of gods, there are two kinds of happiness, I say:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Domanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—There are two kinds of sadness, I say:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Upekkhampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—There are two kinds of equanimity, I say:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Somanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ? Why did I say that there are two kinds of happiness?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā somanassaṁ Well, should you know of a happiness: Jaññā is 3rd singular optative (cp. AN 9.6:3.4).
‘imaṁ kho me somanassaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpaṁ somanassaṁ na sevitabbaṁ. ‘When I cultivate this kind of happiness, unskillful qualities grow, and skillful qualities decline.’ You should not cultivate that kind of happiness.
Tattha yaṁ jaññā somanassaṁ Whereas, should you know of a happiness:
‘imaṁ kho me somanassaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpaṁ somanassaṁ sevitabbaṁ. ‘When I cultivate this kind of happiness, unskillful qualities decline, and skillful qualities grow.’ You should cultivate that kind of happiness.
Tattha yañce savitakkaṁ savicāraṁ, yañce avitakkaṁ avicāraṁ, ye avitakke avicāre, te paṇītatare. And that which is free of placing the mind and keeping it connected is better than that which still involves placing the mind and keeping it connected. That is, second jhāna is better than first jhāna.
Somanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti. That’s why I said there are two kinds of happiness.
Iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Domanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ? Why did I say that there are two kinds of sadness?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā domanassaṁ Well, should you know of a sadness:
‘imaṁ kho me domanassaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpaṁ domanassaṁ na sevitabbaṁ. ‘When I cultivate this kind of sadness, unskillful qualities grow, and skillful qualities decline.’ You should not cultivate that kind of sadness.
Tattha yaṁ jaññā domanassaṁ Whereas, should you know of a sadness:
‘imaṁ kho me domanassaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpaṁ domanassaṁ sevitabbaṁ. ‘When I cultivate this kind of sadness, unskillful qualities decline, and skillful qualities grow.’ You should cultivate that kind of sadness. Overwhelmingly, the suttas speak of happiness in the path to liberation. They do, however, also acknowledge that sometimes temporary states of sadness leading to disillusionment can spur a person on the path.
Tattha yañce savitakkaṁ savicāraṁ, yañce avitakkaṁ avicāraṁ, ye avitakke avicāre, te paṇītatare. And that which is free of placing the mind and keeping it connected is better than that which still involves placing the mind and keeping it connected. It is hard to know what the text is getting at here, as there is no “sadness” in any jhāna.
Domanassampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti That’s why I said there are two kinds of sadness.
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Upekkhampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ? Why did I say that there are two kinds of equanimity?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā upekkhaṁ Well, should you know of an equanimity:
‘imaṁ kho me upekkhaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpā upekkhā na sevitabbā. ‘When I cultivate this kind of equanimity, unskillful qualities grow, and skillful qualities decline.’ You should not cultivate that kind of equanimity.
Tattha yaṁ jaññā upekkhaṁ Whereas, should you know of an equanimity:
‘imaṁ kho me upekkhaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpā upekkhā sevitabbā. ‘When I cultivate this kind of equanimity, unskillful qualities decline, and skillful qualities grow.’ You should cultivate that kind of equanimity.
Tattha yañce savitakkaṁ savicāraṁ, yañce avitakkaṁ avicāraṁ, ye avitakke avicāre, te paṇītatare. And that which is free of placing the mind and keeping it connected is better than that which still involves placing the mind and keeping it connected.
Upekkhampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti That’s why I said there are two kinds of equanimity.
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Evaṁ paṭipanno kho, devānaminda, bhikkhu papañcasaññāsaṅkhānirodhasāruppagāminiṁ paṭipadaṁ paṭipanno hotī”ti. That’s how a mendicant fittingly practices for the cessation of judgments driven by the proliferation of perceptions.”
Itthaṁ bhagavā sakkassa devānamindassa pañhaṁ puṭṭho byākāsi. Such was the Buddha’s answer to Sakka.
Attamano sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandi anumodi: Delighted, Sakka approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, saying,
“evametaṁ, bhagavā, evametaṁ, sugata. “That’s so true, Blessed One! That’s so true, Holy One!
Tiṇṇā mettha kaṅkhā vigatā kathaṅkathā bhagavato pañhaveyyākaraṇaṁ sutvā”ti. Hearing the Buddha’s answer, I’ve gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision.”
2.3. Pātimokkhasaṁvara 2.3. Restraint in the Monastic Code
Itiha sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinanditvā anumoditvā bhagavantaṁ uttari pañhaṁ apucchi: And then Sakka asked another question:
“Kathaṁ paṭipanno pana, mārisa, bhikkhu pātimokkhasaṁvarāya paṭipanno hotī”ti? “But good fellow, how does a mendicant practice for restraint in the monastic code?”
“Kāyasamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—“Lord of gods, I say that there are two kinds of bodily behavior: Here the Buddha emphasizes the psychological and spiritual underpinnings of the “monastic code” (pātimokkha).
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Vacīsamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—I say that there are two kinds of verbal behavior:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Pariyesanaṁpāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—There are two kinds of search, I say:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Kāyasamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi sevitabbampi asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ? Why did I say that there are two kinds of bodily behavior?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā kāyasamācāraṁ Well, should you know of a bodily behavior:
‘imaṁ kho me kāyasamācāraṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpo kāyasamācāro na sevitabbo. ‘When I cultivate this kind of bodily behavior, unskillful qualities grow, and skillful qualities decline.’ You should not cultivate that kind of bodily conduct.
Tattha yaṁ jaññā kāyasamācāraṁ Whereas, should you know of a bodily behavior:
‘imaṁ kho me kāyasamācāraṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpo kāyasamācāro sevitabbo. ‘When I cultivate this kind of bodily behavior, unskillful qualities decline, and skillful qualities grow.’ You should cultivate that kind of bodily conduct.
Kāyasamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—That’s why I said there are two kinds of bodily behavior.
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Vacīsamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—Why did I say that there are two kinds of verbal behavior?
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā vacīsamācāraṁ ‘imaṁ kho me vacīsamācāraṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpo vacīsamācāro na sevitabbo. Well, should you know of a kind of verbal behavior that it causes unskillful qualities to grow while skillful qualities decline, you should not cultivate it.
Tattha yaṁ jaññā vacīsamācāraṁ ‘imaṁ kho me vacīsamācāraṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpo vacīsamācāro sevitabbo. Whereas, should you know of a kind of verbal behavior that it causes unskillful qualities to decline while skillful qualities grow, you should cultivate it.
Vacīsamācārampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—That’s why I said there are two kinds of verbal behavior.
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Pariyesanaṁpāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—Why did I say that there are two kinds of search?
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ, kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ?
Tattha yaṁ jaññā pariyesanaṁ ‘imaṁ kho me pariyesanaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyantī’ti, evarūpā pariyesanā na sevitabbā. Well, should you know of a kind of search that it causes unskillful qualities to grow while skillful qualities decline, you should not cultivate it. The suttas frequently describe three kinds of search: for sensual pleasures, for continued existence, and for a spiritual path (eg. SN 45.161:7.3). The last search led the Buddha to awakening (MN 26:15.1).
Tattha yaṁ jaññā pariyesanaṁ ‘imaṁ kho me pariyesanaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhantī’ti, evarūpā pariyesanā sevitabbā. Whereas, should you know of a kind of search that it causes unskillful qualities to decline while skillful qualities grow, you should cultivate it.
Pariyesanaṁpāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—That’s why I said there are two kinds of search.
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampīti
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.
Evaṁ paṭipanno kho, devānaminda, bhikkhu pātimokkhasaṁvarāya paṭipanno hotī”ti. That’s how a mendicant practices for restraint in the monastic code.”
Itthaṁ bhagavā sakkassa devānamindassa pañhaṁ puṭṭho byākāsi. Such was the Buddha’s answer to Sakka.
Attamano sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandi anumodi: Delighted, Sakka approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, saying,
“evametaṁ, bhagavā, evametaṁ, sugata. “That’s so true, Blessed One! That’s so true, Holy One!
Tiṇṇā mettha kaṅkhā vigatā kathaṅkathā bhagavato pañhaveyyākaraṇaṁ sutvā”ti. Hearing the Buddha’s answer, I’ve gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision.”
2.4. Indriyasaṁvara 2.4. Sense Restraint
Itiha sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinanditvā anumoditvā bhagavantaṁ uttari pañhaṁ apucchi: And then Sakka asked another question:
“Kathaṁ paṭipanno pana, mārisa, bhikkhu indriyasaṁvarāya paṭipanno hotī”ti? “But good fellow, how does a mendicant practice for restraint of the sense faculties?”
“Cakkhuviññeyyaṁ rūpampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—“Lord of gods, I say that there are two kinds of sight known by the eye:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.
Sotaviññeyyaṁ saddampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—There are two kinds of sound known by the ear …
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi.
Ghānaviññeyyaṁ gandhampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—smells known by the nose …
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi.
Jivhāviññeyyaṁ rasampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—tastes known by the tongue …
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi.
Kāyaviññeyyaṁ phoṭṭhabbampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—touches known by the body …
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampi.
Manoviññeyyaṁ dhammampāhaṁ, devānaminda, duvidhena vadāmi—ideas known by the mind:
sevitabbampi, asevitabbampī”ti. that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.”
Evaṁ vutte, sakko devānamindo bhagavantaṁ etadavoca: When the Buddha said this, Sakka said to him:
“Imassa kho ahaṁ, bhante, bhagavatā saṅkhittena bhāsitassa evaṁ vitthārena atthaṁ ājānāmi. “Sir, this is how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement: Sakka switches his term of address for the Buddha from mārisa to the more respectful bhante here, then back to mārisa below. This passage is found at MN 114:24.5, where bhante is used, suggesting it was imported from there.
Yathārūpaṁ, bhante, cakkhuviññeyyaṁ rūpaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyanti, evarūpaṁ cakkhuviññeyyaṁ rūpaṁ na sevitabbaṁ. You should not cultivate the kind of sight known by the eye which causes unskillful qualities to grow while skillful qualities decline. For a more detailed analysis of this, see MN 152.
Yathārūpañca kho, bhante, cakkhuviññeyyaṁ rūpaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, evarūpaṁ cakkhuviññeyyaṁ rūpaṁ sevitabbaṁ. And you should cultivate the kind of sight known by the eye which causes unskillful qualities to decline while skillful qualities grow.
Yathārūpañca kho, bhante, sotaviññeyyaṁ saddaṁ sevato …pe… You should not cultivate the kind of sound,
ghānaviññeyyaṁ gandhaṁ sevato … smell,
jivhāviññeyyaṁ rasaṁ sevato … taste,
kāyaviññeyyaṁ phoṭṭhabbaṁ sevato … touch,
manoviññeyyaṁ dhammaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, kusalā dhammā parihāyanti, evarūpo manoviññeyyo dhammo na sevitabbo. or idea known by the mind which causes unskillful qualities to grow while skillful qualities decline.
Yathārūpañca kho, bhante, manoviññeyyaṁ dhammaṁ sevato akusalā dhammā parihāyanti, kusalā dhammā abhivaḍḍhanti, evarūpo manoviññeyyo dhammo sevitabbo. And you should cultivate the kind of idea known by the mind which causes unskillful qualities to decline while skillful qualities grow.
Imassa kho me, bhante, bhagavatā saṅkhittena bhāsitassa evaṁ vitthārena atthaṁ ājānato Sir, that’s how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement.
tiṇṇā mettha kaṅkhā vigatā kathaṅkathā bhagavato pañhaveyyākaraṇaṁ sutvā”ti. Hearing the Buddha’s answer, I’ve gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision.”
Itiha sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinanditvā anumoditvā bhagavantaṁ uttari pañhaṁ apucchi: And then Sakka asked another question:
“Sabbeva nu kho, mārisa, samaṇabrāhmaṇā ekantavādā ekantasīlā ekantachandā ekantaajjhosānā”ti? “Good fellow, do all ascetics and brahmins have a single doctrine, ethics, desire, and attachment?” The Pali ekanta (“single”) here is a little tricky; it could mean either “the same” or “of one goal”. The Sanskrit has just eka (ekakāmā ekacchandāḥ, “one desire, one wish”), while the commentary explains the first and last terms as “one goal” and the middle terms as “one”.
“Na kho, devānaminda, sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā ekantavādā ekantasīlā ekantachandā ekantaajjhosānā”ti. “No, lord of gods, they do not.”
“Kasmā pana, mārisa, na sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā ekantavādā ekantasīlā ekantachandā ekantaajjhosānā”ti? “Why not?”
“Anekadhātu nānādhātu kho, devānaminda, loko. “The world has many and diverse elements.
Tasmiṁ anekadhātunānādhātusmiṁ loke yaṁ yadeva sattā dhātuṁ abhinivisanti, taṁ tadeva thāmasā parāmāsā abhinivissa voharanti: Whatever element sentient beings insist on in this world of many and diverse elements, they obstinately stick to it, insisting that: The Buddha points out that spiritual teachers, when faced with a world of experiential diversity, tend to prioritize their own experience or doctrine, dismissing others as less real or meaningful.
‘idameva saccaṁ moghamaññan’ti. ‘This is the only truth, anything else is futile.’
Tasmā na sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā ekantavādā ekantasīlā ekantachandā ekantaajjhosānā”ti. That’s why not all ascetics and brahmins have a single doctrine, ethics, desire, and attachment.”
“Sabbeva nu kho, mārisa, samaṇabrāhmaṇā accantaniṭṭhā accantayogakkhemī accantabrahmacārī accantapariyosānā”ti? “Good fellow, have all ascetics and brahmins reached the ultimate end, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate goal?” Yogakkhema (“sanctuary from the yoke”) is a metaphor for Nibbāna that draws from the literal sense of khema as an oasis or sanctuary for men and beasts. After a hard day’s journey, a caravan would stop to rest, “unyoke” the draft animals, lay down the burden, and refresh themselves in the cool waters.
“Na kho, devānaminda, sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā accantaniṭṭhā accantayogakkhemī accantabrahmacārī accantapariyosānā”ti. “No, lord of gods, they have not.”
“Kasmā pana, mārisa, na sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā accantaniṭṭhā accantayogakkhemī accantabrahmacārī accantapariyosānā”ti? “Why not?”
“Ye kho, devānaminda, bhikkhū taṇhāsaṅkhayavimuttā te accantaniṭṭhā accantayogakkhemī accantabrahmacārī accantapariyosānā. “Those mendicants who are freed through the ending of craving have reached the ultimate end, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate goal. This passage is quoted by name by Hāliddikāni at SN 22.4:1.4. The topic is picked up again in MN 31, where we see the extent to which Sakka has learned his lesson. | The text has “mendicants” here, but “ascetics and brahmins” immediately before and after. The quotation at SN 22.4:1.4 has “ascetics and brahmins”, so it is likely the text here is in error.
Tasmā na sabbe samaṇabrāhmaṇā accantaniṭṭhā accantayogakkhemī accantabrahmacārī accantapariyosānā”ti. That’s why not all ascetics and brahmins have reached the ultimate end, the ultimate sanctuary from the yoke, the ultimate spiritual life, the ultimate goal.”
Itthaṁ bhagavā sakkassa devānamindassa pañhaṁ puṭṭho byākāsi. Such was the Buddha’s answer to Sakka.
Attamano sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandi anumodi: Delighted, Sakka approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, saying,
“evametaṁ, bhagavā, evametaṁ, sugata. “That’s so true, Blessed One! That’s so true, Holy One!
Tiṇṇā mettha kaṅkhā vigatā kathaṅkathā bhagavato pañhaveyyākaraṇaṁ sutvā”ti. Hearing the Buddha’s answer, I’ve gone beyond doubt and got rid of indecision.” This is the final substantive question of the series. It is picked up in MN 37:2.2 where Sakka, in a subsequent visit, inquires further as to the nature of those who have realized the ultimate goal.
Itiha sakko devānamindo bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinanditvā anumoditvā bhagavantaṁ etadavoca: And then Sakka, having approved and agreed with what the Buddha said, said to him,
“Ejā, bhante, rogo, ejā gaṇḍo, ejā sallaṁ, ejā imaṁ purisaṁ parikaḍḍhati tassa tasseva bhavassa abhinibbattiyā. “Turbulence, sir, is a disease, a boil, a dart. Turbulence drags a person to be regenerated in one state of existence or another. “Turbulence” is ejā, from a root meaning “motion, agitation”, and hence the opposite of the “imperturbable” (aneja) peace of the Buddha (SN 35.90).
Tasmā ayaṁ puriso uccāvacamāpajjati. That’s why a person finds themselves in states high and low.
Yesāhaṁ, bhante, pañhānaṁ ito bahiddhā aññesu samaṇabrāhmaṇesu okāsakammampi nālatthaṁ, te me bhagavatā byākatā. Elsewhere, among other ascetics and brahmins, I wasn’t even given a chance to ask these questions that the Buddha has answered.
Dīgharattānusayitañca pana me vicikicchākathaṅkathāsallaṁ, tañca bhagavatā abbuḷhan”ti. The dart of doubt and indecision has lain within me for a long time, but the Buddha has plucked it out.”
“Abhijānāsi no tvaṁ, devānaminda, ime pañhe aññe samaṇabrāhmaṇe pucchitā”ti? “Lord of gods, do you recall having asked this question of other ascetics and brahmins?” Compare Ajātasattu’s experience at DN 2:15.1.
“Abhijānāmahaṁ, bhante, ime pañhe aññe samaṇabrāhmaṇe pucchitā”ti. “I do, sir.”
“Yathā kathaṁ pana te, devānaminda, byākaṁsu? Sace te agaru bhāsassū”ti. “If you wouldn’t mind, lord of gods, tell me how they answered.”
“Na kho me, bhante, garu yatthassa bhagavā nisinno bhagavantarūpo vā”ti. “It’s no trouble when someone such as the Blessed One is sitting here.”
“Tena hi, devānaminda, bhāsassū”ti. “Well, speak then, lord of gods.”
“Yesvāhaṁ, bhante, maññāmi samaṇabrāhmaṇā āraññikā pantasenāsanāti, tyāhaṁ upasaṅkamitvā ime pañhe pucchāmi, te mayā puṭṭhā na sampāyanti, asampāyantā mamaṁyeva paṭipucchanti: “Sir, I approached those who I imagined were ascetics and brahmins living in the wilderness, in remote lodgings. But they were stumped by my question, and they even questioned me in return:
‘ko nāmo āyasmā’ti? ‘What is the venerable’s name?’
Tesāhaṁ puṭṭho byākaromi: So I answered them:
‘ahaṁ kho, mārisa, sakko devānamindo’ti. ‘Good fellow, I am Sakka, lord of gods.’
Te mamaṁyeva uttari paṭipucchanti: So they asked me another question:
‘kiṁ panāyasmā, devānaminda, kammaṁ katvā imaṁ ṭhānaṁ patto’ti? ‘But lord of gods, what deed brought you to this position?’
Tesāhaṁ yathāsutaṁ yathāpariyattaṁ dhammaṁ desemi. So I taught them the Dhamma as I had learned and memorized it.
Te tāvatakeneva attamanā honti: And they were pleased with just that much:
‘sakko ca no devānamindo diṭṭho, yañca no apucchimhā, tañca no byākāsī’ti. ‘We have seen Sakka, lord of gods! And he answered our questions!’
Te aññadatthu mamaṁyeva sāvakā sampajjanti, na cāhaṁ tesaṁ. Invariably, they become my disciples, I don’t become theirs.
Ahaṁ kho pana, bhante, bhagavato sāvako sotāpanno avinipātadhammo niyato sambodhiparāyaṇo”ti. But sir, I am the Buddha’s disciple, a stream-enterer, not liable to be reborn in the underworld, assured, destined for awakening.”
2.5. Somanassapaṭilābhakathā 2.5. On Feeling Happy
“Abhijānāsi no tvaṁ, devānaminda, ito pubbe evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhan”ti? “Lord of gods, do you recall ever feeling such joy and happiness before?”
“Abhijānāmahaṁ, bhante, ito pubbe evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhan”ti. “I do, sir.”
“Yathā kathaṁ pana tvaṁ, devānaminda, abhijānāsi ito pubbe evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhan”ti? “But how?”
“Bhūtapubbaṁ, bhante, devāsurasaṅgāmo samupabyūḷho ahosi. “Once upon a time, sir, a battle was fought between the gods and the titans.
Tasmiṁ kho pana, bhante, saṅgāme devā jiniṁsu, asurā parājayiṁsu. In that battle the gods won and the titans lost.
Tassa mayhaṁ, bhante, taṁ saṅgāmaṁ abhivijinitvā vijitasaṅgāmassa etadahosi: It occurred to me as victor,
‘yā ceva dāni dibbā ojā yā ca asurā ojā, ubhayametaṁ devā paribhuñjissantī’ti. ‘Now the gods shall enjoy both the nectar of the gods and the nectar of the titans.’ “Nectar” is ojā, in Vedic texts called soma or amṛta (“ambrosia” of immortality). The battle over nectar by gods (deva) and demons (asura) is a very ancient element of Indo-European mythology.
So kho pana me, bhante, vedapaṭilābho somanassapaṭilābho sadaṇḍāvacaro sasatthāvacaro na nibbidāya na virāgāya na nirodhāya na upasamāya na abhiññāya na sambodhāya na nibbānāya saṁvattati. But sir, that joy and happiness is in the sphere of the rod and the sword. It doesn’t lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.
Yo kho pana me ayaṁ, bhante, bhagavato dhammaṁ sutvā vedapaṭilābho somanassapaṭilābho, so adaṇḍāvacaro asatthāvacaro ekantanibbidāya virāgāya nirodhāya upasamāya abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattatī”ti. But the joy and happiness I feel listening to the Buddha’s teaching is not in the sphere of the rod and the sword. It does lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.” Here Sakka makes a clean break from the violent delights he enjoyed in former (Vedic) times.
“Kiṁ pana tvaṁ, devānaminda, atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedesī”ti? “But lord of gods, what reason do you see for speaking of such joy and happiness?”
“Cha kho ahaṁ, bhante, atthavase sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. “I see six reasons to speak of such joy and happiness, sir.
Idheva tiṭṭhamānassa, While staying right here,
devabhūtassa me sato; remaining in the godly form,
Punarāyu ca me laddho, I have gained an extended life: Punarāyu is a unique term. It probably means that Sakka can extend his current fortunate birth due to the merit of Dhamma.
evaṁ jānāhi mārisa. know this, dear sir.
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, paṭhamaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the first reason.
Cutāhaṁ diviyā kāyā, When I fall from the heavenly host,
āyuṁ hitvā amānusaṁ; leaving behind the non-human life,
Amūḷho gabbhamessāmi, I shall consciously go to a new womb, To die “unconfused” or “consciously” is said to be a benefit of Dhamma practice (eg. AN 5.215:2.3).
yattha me ramatī mano. wherever my mind delights.
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, dutiyaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the second reason.
Svāhaṁ amūḷhapaññassa, Living happily under the guidance
viharaṁ sāsane rato; of the one of unclouded wisdom,
Ñāyena viharissāmi, I shall practice systematically, “Systematically” (or “according to method”, ñāyena) recalls ñāyapaṭipanno as a description of the noble ones. It means practicing according with the noble eightfold path, a “method” that yields definite results.
sampajāno paṭissato. aware and mindful.
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, tatiyaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the third reason.
Ñāyena me carato ca, And if awakening should arise
sambodhi ce bhavissati; as I practice systematically,
Aññātā viharissāmi, I shall live as one who understands,
sveva anto bhavissati. and my end shall come right there. This refers to the possibility of achieving perfection (arahattā).
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, catutthaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the fourth reason.
Cutāhaṁ mānusā kāyā, When I fall from the human realm,
āyuṁ hitvāna mānusaṁ; leaving behind the human life,
Puna devo bhavissāmi, I shall become a god again,
devalokamhi uttamo. supreme in the heaven realm. That is, after passing away as Sakka and being reborn as a human, he will subsequently return to the heaven realm.
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, pañcamaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the fifth reason.
Te paṇītatarā devā, They are the finest of gods,
akaniṭṭhā yasassino; the glorious Akaniṭṭhas.
Antime vattamānamhi, So long as my final life goes on, He predicts that his final life will be in this high realm that is inhabited by non-returners (AN 9.12:6.7).
so nivāso bhavissati. there my home will be.
Imaṁ kho ahaṁ, bhante, chaṭṭhaṁ atthavasaṁ sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. This is the sixth reason.
Ime kho ahaṁ, bhante, cha atthavase sampassamāno evarūpaṁ vedapaṭilābhaṁ somanassapaṭilābhaṁ pavedemi. Seeing these six reasons I speak of such joy and happiness.
Apariyositasaṅkappo, My wishes unfulfilled,
vicikiccho kathaṅkathī; doubting and indecisive,
Vicariṁ dīghamaddhānaṁ, I wandered for such a long time,
anvesanto tathāgataṁ. in search of the Realized One.
Yassu maññāmi samaṇe, I imagined that ascetics
pavivittavihārino; living in seclusion
Sambuddhā iti maññāno, must surely be awakened,
gacchāmi te upāsituṁ. so I went to sit near them.
‘Kathaṁ ārādhanā hoti, ‘How is there success?
kathaṁ hoti virādhanā’; How is there failure?’
Iti puṭṭhā na sampāyanti, But they were stumped by such questions
magge paṭipadāsu ca. about the path and practice.
Tyassu yadā maṁ jānanti, And when they found out that I
sakko devānamāgato; was Sakka, come from the gods,
Tyassu mameva pucchanti, they questioned me instead about
‘kiṁ katvā pāpuṇī idaṁ’. the deed that brought me to this state.
Tesaṁ yathāsutaṁ dhammaṁ, I taught them the Dhamma
desayāmi jane sutaṁ; as I had learned it among men.
Tena attamanā honti, They were delighted with that, saying:
‘diṭṭho no vāsavoti ca’. ‘We’ve seen Vāsava!’
Yadā ca buddhamaddakkhiṁ, Now since I’ve seen the Buddha,
vicikicchāvitāraṇaṁ; who helps us overcome doubt,
Somhi vītabhayo ajja, today, free of fear,
sambuddhaṁ payirupāsiya. I pay homage to the awakened one.
Taṇhāsallassa hantāraṁ, Destroyer of the dart of craving,
buddhaṁ appaṭipuggalaṁ; the Buddha is unrivaled.
Ahaṁ vande mahāvīraṁ, I bow to the great hero,
buddhamādiccabandhunaṁ. the Buddha, Kinsman of the Sun.
Yaṁ karomasi brahmuno, In the same way that divinity ought be revered Karomasi is middle imperative 1st plural, “we should do”, glossed by the commentary as “we should pay homage” (namakkāraṁ karoma).
samaṁ devehi mārisa; by we gods, dear sir, Samaṁ is an indeclinable in the sense “likewise”.
Tadajja tuyhaṁ kassāma, today we shall revere you—
handa sāmaṁ karoma te. come, let us revere you ourselves! Sāmaṁ is an indeclinable in the sense “oneself, personally, one’s own”.
Tvameva asi sambuddho, You alone are the Awakened!
tuvaṁ satthā anuttaro; You are the Teacher supreme!
Sadevakasmiṁ lokasmiṁ, In the world with its gods,
natthi te paṭipuggalo”ti. you have no rival.”
Atha kho sakko devānamindo pañcasikhaṁ gandhabbaputtaṁ āmantesi: Then Sakka addressed the centaur Pañcasikha,
“bahūpakāro kho mesi tvaṁ, tāta pañcasikha, yaṁ tvaṁ bhagavantaṁ paṭhamaṁ pasādesi. “Dear Pañcasikha, you were very helpful to me, since you first charmed the Buddha,
Tayā, tāta, paṭhamaṁ pasāditaṁ pacchā mayaṁ taṁ bhagavantaṁ dassanāya upasaṅkamimhā arahantaṁ sammāsambuddhaṁ. after which I went to see him.
Pettike vā ṭhāne ṭhapayissāmi, gandhabbarājā bhavissasi, bhaddañca te sūriyavacchasaṁ dammi, sā hi te abhipatthitā”ti. I shall appoint you to your father’s position—you shall be king of the centaurs. And I give you Bhaddā Suriyavaccasā, for she loves you very much.” A gandharva wedding must be a mutual love match.
Atha kho sakko devānamindo pāṇinā pathaviṁ parāmasitvā tikkhattuṁ udānaṁ udānesi: Then Sakka, touching the ground with his hand, expressed this heartfelt sentiment three times: “Touching the ground with his hand” is a unique gesture in the early Pali, immortalized in later legend when the Buddha touches the ground to invoke the Earth Goddess as witness of his striving.
“Namo tassa bhagavato arahato sammāsambuddhassa. “Homage to him, the blessed one, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha!
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato sammāsambuddhassa. Homage to him, the blessed one, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha!
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato sammāsambuddhassā”ti. Homage to him, the blessed one, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha!”
Imasmiñca pana veyyākaraṇasmiṁ bhaññamāne sakkassa devānamindassa virajaṁ vītamalaṁ dhammacakkhuṁ udapādi: And while this discourse was being spoken, the stainless, immaculate vision of the Dhamma arose in Sakka, lord of gods:
“yaṁ kiñci samudayadhammaṁ sabbaṁ taṁ nirodhadhamman”ti. “Everything that is liable to arise is liable to cease.”
Aññesañca asītiyā devatāsahassānaṁ; And also for another 80,000 deities. Sakka is also said to have been accompanied by 80,000 deities at SN 40.10:4.4. This is one of many indications that this is a late discourse, several of which have been touched on above: late or unique terminology; fancy literary styles; adoption of doctrinal passages from elsewhere in a sometimes clumsy fashion; and so on. In determining whether a sutta is late or early, we do not rely on a single definitive reason, but on a cluster of independent criteria which taken together are most easily explained in terms of historical development.
iti ye sakkena devānamindena ajjhiṭṭhapañhā puṭṭhā, te bhagavatā byākatā. Such were the questions Sakka was invited to ask, and which were answered by the Buddha.
Tasmā imassa veyyākaraṇassa sakkapañhātveva adhivacananti. And that’s why the name of this discussion is “Sakka’s Questions”.
Sakkapañhasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ aṭṭhamaṁ.